From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from cgl.ntg.nl (Cgl.ntg.nl [5.39.185.202]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4113326786 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 01:34:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0331A484713 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 01:33:32 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cgl.ntg.nl Authentication-Results: cgl.ntg.nl (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=jdvb.ca Received: from cgl.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cgl.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nYAsW0N4VT7A for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 01:33:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from cgl.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23263484725 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 01:32:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5347E4843D6 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 01:32:02 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cgl.ntg.nl Received: from cgl.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cgl.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iMRS-mhhwn-v for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 01:32:01 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=67.215.8.21; helo=seout12.web-dns1.com; envelope-from=zlists+context@jdvb.ca; receiver= Received: from seout12.web-dns1.com (seout12.web-dns1.com [67.215.8.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D35F84843D2 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 01:32:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailpro1.whc.ca ([51.79.16.13]) by se3.web-dns1.com with esmtps (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rm0v1-0092GX-2k; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 20:32:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jdvb.ca; s=default; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=rXEICVRgDZjKnYxPFZBpP1t/ysOQY2OACjA1fB3Cdv0=; b=l/iq/uKEElwiMGqXxw4g0su4Z8 1x2gbga1tVpWxe9/vb+9WgNwxarSmHaNgi5O4ScBdepaqJIuu6n7cedMF/u9lpz7bYGaqi4HW7PWt FfiiWFsAmzvpLstRjWoBHqzeFLhyzYx349XHW0RqzDQcmDQS4SYVM7/Ljn13OihyuYrQ/9ppbWOW2 MShcFWgB/vJ/7FjQGz7UCJm2aAau3s132ItnTLAxwwohdvFlZWRrn1e4DLfb8f5KojXbjSTUo8tO5 fPvARHH3KP88OGgl2qF0tFU1WowZiMIseHO/te/j1VSUm1pJGN2QQoDmczj0Q2OYo4NSYThZQL/9Z r96MJvDg==; Received: from [47.55.144.2] (port=48362 helo=x360) by mailpro1.whc.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rm0uu-004wdh-00; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 20:31:58 -0400 Received: by x360 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6EC701E0733; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 21:31:51 -0300 (ADT) Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 21:31:51 -0300 From: Jim To: Hans Hagen , ntg-context@ntg.nl Message-ID: References: <5b3c436565692c3da7b76aa4666d9d0c22eeb46b.camel@telus.net> <388n0p2r-9n2n-3470-r90p-12508p0spp8p@hzvpu.rqh> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Microslop: Just say no X-Originating-IP: 51.79.16.13 X-SpamExperts-Domain: out.mailpro1.whc.ca X-SpamExperts-Username: 51.79.16.13 Authentication-Results: web-dns1.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=51.79.16.13@out.mailpro1.whc.ca X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: ham X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.26) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-Filter-ID: Pt3MvcO5N4iKaDQ5O6lkdGlMVN6RH8bjRMzItlySaT9vKWsGweolKBBO2eya5+0APUtbdvnXkggZ 3YnVId/Y5jcf0yeVQAvfjHznO7+bT5xyhIWrzm7X+SwM1ei89wyJd/jn/toj8NLsTrGhN8WbTusb He+8lAiCixmW9cAnzeFBpc/AiUjjK788fU1YN0ZF+wYAnMKkZYImipUB+riQr1O05s+oip5EC/YK rMQ9+O+cxJgmToHXVJNDqY/AHcvn/aMJR8Jg0XraN6ru5DtlouMX1fB0BhYOOf+RUeE6zcqmY+jM 06n6H6SrH6UqG+agKbYxqjUGmOChj9WMgWYsmVghFiuDCY0EdD8+W8Mu0TYWMMRtIEQQxlrKshc4 xAK4g+WnxXPxePRFPW6dC7hCK7birDo/OUFm5vz7JPyFADtEDBffVZVjmVaNbG4ZJG7FGlb4maTP ilhdhTWiGMdibSxEsh1Hp9llCOTPYklqHmlQef6Ceaw0tyEeHKZjklTreHL+whhAdKuW1jHRpIte toDEYLclHjUgJJIv/D3tQ11p5rZkT68HH8TWjo7+EXCtLFpFCyJ/9hQbxd9VB27J3XoSKlHMxVnk urBPHtW+f1JWl9AKOV/fU5Ys3Y1o14XLbIutHK5QGT+igkWJ8wNw/NQxHDM/gYYNNIXTwz/v9svb uMOx/3LNfkXD6TGNX2f2GqKx4dxL8WYt+hi03Bi5RsWUVm6HSYkQKUJNy9uY/OrDEd6Yplvh+oay 7O24oTPnYM6TikpsbevO3LxwVw4oFQkIkfZf+TDs1tuvVqr9Qp7FhoD2JK4HP/ea0z9pPPuJgtKE pA02jLywW3F9i+ZCmL5hAbUNqIuBiEqMfMn9mdtItEV07/wHISc20KDGiD3YELVlxMTxpdvCqmIf vHIJr36m+UeFXprlCOm3BAEbJtBibY2kckBJCLF3GudT1upwaHLF9/pweBF5aM+n/aZuZbVmHgH+ TSF+/ZOqpSKaGfp5FxL+psyrAqSid1fuJklQR0XoXiAcBwXAaMq9eakesAhTMFWTDzTu/7rvCynG Qw8xL7hrJSk60SF3F6RYOYr2 X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@se1.web-dns1.com Message-ID-Hash: JZXWO2UE5TKI3EKJGCUDGEQEU346VVBB X-Message-ID-Hash: JZXWO2UE5TKI3EKJGCUDGEQEU346VVBB X-MailFrom: zlists+context@jdvb.ca X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: mailing list for ConTeXt users X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.8 Precedence: list Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Subject: [NTG-context] Re: PDF, runner, and TikZ patches List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 15:20 (+0100), Hans Hagen wrote: > On 3/16/2024 2:10 PM, Jim wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 01:53 (+0100), Aditya Mahajan wrote: >>> On Thu, 14 Mar 2024, Jim wrote: >>> > Max (et al), >>> > were you hoping the ConTeXt distribution would ship its own >>> > pgfutil-context.def, or were you hoping that someone could convince Henri >>> > to put the RGB change in? >>> We can patch some of the definitions of pgfutil-context.def in m-tikz if >>> really needed, but it would be preferable to first check if tikz >>> maintainers are willing to merge them upstream. >> Unfortunately, it seems that the maintainer feels that if we can't deal >> with cmyk profiles, we shouldn't have cmyk at all. I don't agree, but >> that's where it ended. (I was arguing for plain TeX support at the time in >> the linked^2 message, but I was able to add the definition for cmyk to my >> own macro file, so I was able to process examples with cmyk colours.) > What does the maintainer mean by that ... context The maintainer's comment was about plain TeX, not context. Sorry if that wasn't clear. In any case, I should have sent my request to Max alone, rather than the ntg-context list, because if Max was going to push something there, I was hoping that a second appeal for cmyk colour support in plain would be nice. (I'm not quite ready to give up all of my plain TeX files.) > can add profiles if configured to do so (best not to embed them) ... and > why should there be a profile anyway ... crappy arguments .. I agree about the colour profile, but the last time I poked that bear, my pleas fell on deaf ears. [And in summary, to be clear: I'm good with the colour support in ConTeXt!] Jim ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror) archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________