From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/13602 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steffen Wolfrum Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Do typescripts slow down ConTeXt? Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:37:18 +0200 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1064835842 17041 80.91.224.253 (29 Sep 2003 11:44:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 11:44:02 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Mon Sep 29 13:44:01 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A3wRd-0004UT-00 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:44:01 +0200 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E1EB10B29; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:43:58 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de [62.67.200.157]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7EDB10B26 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:37:34 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: (qmail 20478 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2003 11:37:32 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO [217.184.17.3]) (159967@[217.184.14.227]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 29 Sep 2003 11:37:32 -0000 X-Sender: 159967 Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:13602 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:13602 Hans Hagen wrote: > At 12:39 29/09/2003 +0200, you wrote: > >Hans Hagen wrote: > > > > > i admit that typescripts are not fast, but the advantages of the current > > > method is that i can change them easily as well as use different criteria > > > when loading them; i did some experiments with (memory hungry) preloading, > > > but on my system it made no real difference; normally the filesystem caches > > > the files quite well; file searching may take a while when the file table > > > (mktexlsr) is not up to date > > > >OK, but how can I at least switch off loading parts (typescripts, map > >files... see below) that I don't need? > > > >I didn't dare to go to the source and comment in/out lines myself. > > you can of course make a minimal typescript file and then load only that > one by setting: > > \def\typescriptfiles{yourfile.tex} > > Hans Thank you. Much better now! Steffen