From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/13615
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Steffen Wolfrum <st.wolfrum@estfiles.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context
Subject: Re: Again: How to make empty pages by default empty?
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 10:11:43 +0200
Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl
Message-ID: <a05210601bb9ee90ffaeb@[217.184.8.28]>
Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1064910331 11873 80.91.224.253 (30 Sep 2003 08:25:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 08:25:31 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Tue Sep 30 10:25:29 2003
Return-path: <ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl>
Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl)
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1A4Fp3-0004me-00
	for <gctc-ntg-context-518@gmane.org>; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 10:25:29 +0200
Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F2B7710B23; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 10:25:26 +0200 (MEST)
Original-Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de [62.67.200.157])
	by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E7810AE7
	for <ntg-context@ntg.nl>; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 10:12:37 +0200 (MEST)
Original-Received: (qmail 32031 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2003 08:12:35 -0000
Original-Received: from unknown (HELO [217.184.8.28]) (159967@[217.184.14.224])
          (envelope-sender <st.wolfrum@estfiles.de>)
          by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
          for <ntg-context@ntg.nl>; 30 Sep 2003 08:12:35 -0000
X-Sender: 159967
Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl
X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:ntg-context-request@ntg.nl?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context>,
	<mailto:ntg-context-request@ntg.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context.ntg.nl>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context>,
	<mailto:ntg-context-request@ntg.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:13615
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:13615

Patrick Gundlach <pg@levana.de> wrote:

> Steffen Wolfrum <st.wolfrum@estfiles.de> writes:
> 
> 
> > This \setupsectionblock[...part][page=no] is a good idea, 
> > but the pagebreak definition was wrong. See this:
> >
> > \definepagebreak
> >     [chapter]
> >     [yes,header,right]
> 
> 
> I can't see any difference here.



I also can't see the difference between

\definepagebreak[chapter][empty,header,right]

and

\definepagebreak[chapter][yes,header,right]

But the first one gives three additional pages where just one is needed,
and the control over the empty page's header (empty or not) gets lost.

The [yes,header,right] solution gives just the page that is needed (for the next chapter to start on a right page) and this page is empty, finally.

Steffen