From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/13371 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steffen Wolfrum Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: \indenting[*hang*] ?! Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:28:29 +0200 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1063975223 24747 80.91.224.253 (19 Sep 2003 12:40:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 12:40:23 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Fri Sep 19 14:40:21 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A0KYf-0005RN-00 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:40:21 +0200 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 715D610B73; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:40:19 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de [62.67.200.157]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672D510B34 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:29:30 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: (qmail 28673 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2003 12:29:27 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO [217.184.12.124]) (664943@[217.184.8.113]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 19 Sep 2003 12:29:27 -0000 X-Sender: 664943@pop3.estfiles.de Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:13371 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:13371 Hi, Is there a way to have something like \indenting[hang] ? With the first line not indented, but the second and following lines? First I thought this is what is ment by \indenting[next], but \indenting[next] seems to be exactly the same as \indenting[first], is this right? Always happy for replies, Steffen