From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/16176
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: esther+steffen <post@est.estfiles.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context
Subject: a footnote bug?
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:09:31 +0200
Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl
Message-ID: <a06002005bd49049ca18c@[62.134.77.121]>
Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1092988648 7969 80.91.224.253 (20 Aug 2004 07:57:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 07:57:28 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Aug 20 09:57:15 2004
Return-path: <ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl>
Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl)
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1By4Gx-0002Pj-00
	for <gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org>; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:57:15 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91301279B;
	Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:57:14 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with LMTP id 10703-02-2; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:57:11 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A3D1278A;
	Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:57:11 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F98512771
	for <ntg-context@ntg.nl>; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:09:44 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with LMTP id 30045-09 for <ntg-context@ntg.nl>;
	Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:09:44 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (unknown [62.67.200.156])
	by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA941276F
	for <ntg-context@ntg.nl>; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:09:44 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: (qmail 740 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2004 13:09:43 -0000
Original-Received: from unknown (HELO [62.134.77.121]) (397506@[62.134.73.129])
	(envelope-sender <post@est.estfiles.de>)
	by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
	for <ntg-context@ntg.nl>; 18 Aug 2004 13:09:43 -0000
X-Sender: 397506@pop3.estfiles.de
Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:57:11 +0200
X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context.ntg.nl>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context>,
	<mailto:ntg-context-request@ntg.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context>
List-Post: <mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl>
List-Help: <mailto:ntg-context-request@ntg.nl?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context>,
	<mailto:ntg-context-request@ntg.nl?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:16176
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:16176

Hi,

when setting the \setupfootnotedefinition 
with location=margin, or location=inleft
there is always a little distance between footnote number and footnote text.
Neither width nor distance can affect it.

Does this distance cannot be adjusted?

Thank you,
Steffen Wolfrum