From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/16141 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steffen Wolfrum Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: a footnote bug? Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 22:01:04 +0200 Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Message-ID: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1092859643 12968 80.91.224.253 (18 Aug 2004 20:07:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 20:07:23 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Aug 18 22:07:14 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BxWcC-0003Oc-00 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 22:00:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD781278B; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 22:00:55 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 32396-01; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 22:00:52 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D9212783; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 22:00:52 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F76E12783 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 22:00:51 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 32271-05 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 22:00:50 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (unknown [62.67.200.157]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D951277A for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 22:00:50 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: (qmail 19494 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2004 20:00:49 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO [62.134.77.121]) (698580@[62.134.74.3]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 18 Aug 2004 20:00:49 -0000 X-Sender: 698580@pop3.estfiles.de Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:16141 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:16141 Hans Hagen wrote: > Steffen Wolfrum wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >when setting the \setupfootnotedefinition > >with location=margin, or location=inleft > >there is always a little distance between footnote number and footnote text. > >Neither width nor distance can affect it. > > > >Does this distance cannot be adjusted? > > > > > can you make me a small demo file? > > Hans Yes, sure. I just made a frame around the footnote number so you'll can clearly see the gap: \def\myFNnumber#1{\inframed[width=\leftmarginwidth,offset=.0em,frame=on,align=left]{#1}} \setupfootnotedefinition[command=\myFNnumber,location=inleft] \setuppagenumbering [alternative=doublesided,location={header,right}] \showframe \showgrid \starttext test\footnote{first note} \page testest\footnote{second note} \stoptext Steffen