From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/21472
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Steffen Wolfrum <context@st.estfiles.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context
Subject: Re: indentaion
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 14:36:27 +0200
Message-ID: <a06210200bf02a3fbdc13@[213.20.142.130]>
Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1121776648 20319 80.91.229.2 (19 Jul 2005 12:37:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:37:28 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Jul 19 14:37:17 2005
Return-path: <ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl>
Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl)
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DurLZ-0005BP-Fu
	for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 14:37:17 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB56127CF;
	Tue, 19 Jul 2005 14:37:16 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
 id 19918-03; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 14:37:12 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2068F127B6;
	Tue, 19 Jul 2005 14:37:12 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694EE127B6
	for <ntg-context@ntg.nl>; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 14:37:11 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with LMTP id 19785-06 for <ntg-context@ntg.nl>;
	Tue, 19 Jul 2005 14:37:10 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: from smtprelay04.ispgateway.de (smtprelay04.ispgateway.de
	[80.67.18.16]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A672A12799
	for <ntg-context@ntg.nl>; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 14:37:10 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: (qmail 27908 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2005 12:37:09 -0000
Original-Received: from unknown (HELO [87.193.4.39]) (698580@[87.193.4.39])
	(envelope-sender <context@st.estfiles.de>)
	by smtprelay04.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
	for <ntg-context@ntg.nl>; 19 Jul 2005 12:37:09 -0000
Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl
X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context.ntg.nl>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context>,
	<mailto:ntg-context-request@ntg.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context>
List-Post: <mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl>
List-Help: <mailto:ntg-context-request@ntg.nl?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context>,
	<mailto:ntg-context-request@ntg.nl?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl
Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on smtp.ntg.nl
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:21472
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:21472

>  > Is anyone using \indenting[no] to suppress the next indentation?
>
>  I used to in the very early beginnings. But very quickly i got lazy
>  and reverted to using \noindent instead. I wouldn't mind having it
>  go away or changing.
>
>  Taco


same for me

Steffen