From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/18612 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steffen Wolfrum Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Re: [OS X TeX] TeX run : 8 Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:03:19 +0100 Message-ID: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" ; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1109779572 1265 80.91.229.2 (2 Mar 2005 16:06:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:06:12 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Mar 02 17:06:12 2005 Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D6WI1-0000LU-0e for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 17:01:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF82B127E1; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:06:23 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 27631-06; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:06:23 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560D6127E9; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:04:41 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4B9127E9 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:04:40 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 27518-03-2 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:04:39 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.14]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799D7127E1 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:04:39 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: (qmail 7755 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2005 16:04:38 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO [62.134.72.151]) (698580@[62.134.77.108]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 2 Mar 2005 16:04:38 -0000 Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-MailScanner-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-MailScanner-To: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:18612 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:18612 =2E.. I meant: maybe this is too old? c \thisisutilityversion{2003.07.19} Steffen Gerben Wierda wrote: > > Hans Hagen wrote: > >> texexec test --pdf --runs=3D1 > >> copy test.tui 1.tui > >> texexec test --pdf --runs=3D2 > >> copy test.tui 2.tui > >> texexec test --pdf --runs=3D3 > >> copy test.tui 3.tui > >> texexec test --pdf > >> copy test.tui n.tui > >> > >> where do the tui's difer? > >> > >> Hans > > > > > > They don't. They are all the same. > > But nevertheless texexec test --pdf ran 8 runs ... > > - How do you check that they are the same? (cmp command?) =2E.. > G I opened them and they wrote all the same: c \thisissectionseparator{:} c \thisisutilityversion{2003.07.19} c \thisisbytesequence{=07=1B=93} f b {test} f b {PARTS/ONE.tex} f e {PARTS/ONE.tex} f b {PARTS/TWO.tex} f e {PARTS/TWO.tex} c \initializevariable\usedcolorchannels{} f e {test} c \initializevariable\lastpage{1} c \initializevariable\lastpagenumber{1} c \initializevariable\totalnofMPgraphics{0} c \initializevariable\totalnofpositions{0} c \initializevariable\totalnofparbackgrounds{0} c \initializevariable\currentstrategypass{1} Steffen