font question re U+00336

font question re U+00336

[jbf via ntg-context]

I wonder if someone can help me interpret this message in the log file

fonts           > start missing characters: 
/home/jbf/bin/context/tex/texmf/fonts/opentype/public/tex-gyre/texgyrepagella-regular.otf
fonts           >   88  U+00336  ̶  COMBINING LONG STROKE OVERLAY
fonts           > stop missing characters

My questions are as follows:

1. What does 88 mean here? 88 instances of this missing glyph? Page 88? 
Or something else? or in other words, how might I discover where 
something is missing from the original text?

2. Tex Gyre Pagella is normally a pretty handy typeface to use for me 
because it has pretty much all the glyphs I normally need... except this 
one obviously! Isn't it really just an en rule (or very similar to 
such)? Or in other words, how do I best overcome the problem of this 
missing character?

3. And perhaps connected with the above question: is there good fallback 
solution one can use? Do I need to \definefontfallback something or is 
there an automatic one already happening?

I've started to examine the log files a bit more carefully for various 
items and it is showing up my ignorance!!

Julian

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: font question re U+00336

[Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context]

Hi Julian,

Am 24.05.22 um 02:30 schrieb jbf via ntg-context:
> I wonder if someone can help me interpret this message in the log file
> 
> fonts           > start missing characters: 
> /home/jbf/bin/context/tex/texmf/fonts/opentype/public/tex-gyre/texgyrepagella-regular.otf 
> 
> fonts           >   88  U+00336  ̶  COMBINING LONG STROKE OVERLAY
> fonts           > stop missing characters
> 
> My questions are as follows:
> 
> 1. What does 88 mean here? 88 instances of this missing glyph? Page 88? 
> Or something else? or in other words, how might I discover where 
> something is missing from the original text?

Don’t know. In a different context (haha) I’d say a nazi greeting.

> 2. Tex Gyre Pagella is normally a pretty handy typeface to use for me 
> because it has pretty much all the glyphs I normally need... except this 
> one obviously! Isn't it really just an en rule (or very similar to 
> such)? Or in other words, how do I best overcome the problem of this 
> missing character?

"combining" means a combining accent.

In case you’re on MacOS and copied the text from e.g. a PDF, MacOS 
decomposes many (all?) accented vowels, like u + combining trema instead 
of a proper ü umlaut glyph, and that can cause missing or displaced 
accents, depending on the font.

Similar with additional space “glyphs” that are often missing in fonts 
and cause warnings like this.

Are you missing any characters where this long stroke should appear?

> 3. And perhaps connected with the above question: is there good fallback 
> solution one can use? Do I need to \definefontfallback something or is 
> there an automatic one already happening?
> 
> I've started to examine the log files a bit more carefully for various 
> items and it is showing up my ignorance!!

I wouldn’t call that ignorance – you can ignore a lot of warnings if the 
output looks good enough.

Hraban
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: font question re U+00336

[jbf via ntg-context]

I think I'll take comfort from your final comment - the output looks 
good enough! But I remain intrigued.

Julian

On 24/5/22 17:26, Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context wrote:
> you can ignore a lot of warnings if the output looks good enough. 
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________