From: Hans Hagen <j.hagen@xs4all.nl>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>,
Rik Kabel <ConTeXt@rik.users.panix.com>
Subject: Re: attachments working again (issue with /EmbeddedFiles)
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 09:56:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aaca0ca0-1a9d-a80b-9bb6-71626b62786c@xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <199bc372-d26b-e7aa-48b4-e2764db7dada@rik.users.panix.com>
On 2/13/2020 12:45 AM, Rik Kabel wrote:
> Perhaps there is something in the difference between annotations and
> attachments that results in different treatments by the various viewers.
it has always been that messy; there's also the annotation symbol
treatment that can differ; it doesn't help that acrobat changed
behaviour a couple of times i think
this is why the whole attachment handling was as it is: some comprimise
that kind of made them show up ok on the average; but validatin spoiled
this and now we're stick with these incompatible viewer behaviour .. not
much we can do about it i fear
(For instance, i remember that at some point acrobat showed attachments
twice in some lists. Often these features ended up in specs without
viewer support yet so probably not well tested for interferences either.)
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-13 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-07 19:46 Pablo Rodriguez
2020-02-07 20:19 ` Rik Kabel
2020-02-07 20:55 ` Pablo Rodriguez
2020-02-07 21:37 ` Hans Hagen
2020-02-08 8:20 ` Pablo Rodriguez
2020-02-08 12:45 ` Peter Rolf
2020-02-08 17:32 ` Pablo Rodriguez
2020-02-08 21:13 ` Rik Kabel
2020-02-12 19:20 ` Pablo Rodriguez
2020-02-12 22:22 ` Rik Kabel
2020-02-12 23:45 ` Rik Kabel
2020-02-13 8:56 ` Hans Hagen [this message]
2020-02-14 2:43 ` Rik Kabel
2020-02-14 21:23 ` Pablo Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aaca0ca0-1a9d-a80b-9bb6-71626b62786c@xs4all.nl \
--to=j.hagen@xs4all.nl \
--cc=ConTeXt@rik.users.panix.com \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).