issue with symbol in attachments

issue with symbol in attachments

[Pablo Rodriguez]

Dear list,

I have the following sample:

    \setupinteraction[state=start]
    \setuppapersize[A9]
    \starttext
    \attachment[xml-mkiv.pdf]\\
    \attachment[xml-mkiv.pdf]
        [symbol=Pushpin
         width=fit,
         width=fit,
         depth=fit]\\
    \attachment[xml-mkiv.pdf]
        [symbol=Default]\\
    \attachment[xml-mkiv.pdf]
        [symbol=Paperclip]\\
    \attachment[xml-mkiv.pdf]
        [symbol=Graph]\\
    \attachment[xml-mkiv.pdf]
        [symbol=Pushpin]\\
    \stoptext

Symbols aren’t distorted with comments, although option "Default"
doesn’t seem to work well.

    \setupinteraction[state=start]
    \setuppapersize[A9]
    \starttext
     \comment[xml-mkiv.pdf]\\
    a\comment[xml-mkiv.pdf]
        [symbol=Default]\\
    b\comment[xml-mkiv.pdf]
        [symbol=Newparagraph]\\
    c\comment[xml-mkiv.pdf]
        [symbol=Note]\\
    d\comment[xml-mkiv.pdf]
        [symbol=Insert]\\
    e\comment[xml-mkiv.pdf]
        [symbol=Help]\\
    \stoptext


Can anyone confirm that all attachment symbols are distorted, except the
first one?

BTW, I’m using latest beta (2019.03.21 21:39).

Many thanks for your help,

Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: issue with symbol in attachments

[Hans Hagen]

On 3/24/2019 6:47 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:

> Can anyone confirm that all attachment symbols are distorted, except the
> first one?
hard to say ... support for these symbols / icons in viewers has been an 
inconsistent mess right from the start and one has to keep adapting ... 
(scaling, positioning, decoupled representations, colors) ... a bit of a 
gamble

Hans

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
        tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: issue with symbol in attachments

[Pablo Rodriguez]

On 3/25/19 10:48 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 3/24/2019 6:47 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>
>> Can anyone confirm that all attachment symbols are distorted, except the
>> first one?
> hard to say ... support for these symbols / icons in viewers has been an
> inconsistent mess right from the start and one has to keep adapting ...
> (scaling, positioning, decoupled representations, colors) ... a bit of a
> gamble

Many thanks for your reply, Hans.

I find suprising that /Rect entriess aren’t calculated the same way when
no dimension is specified. The following sample shows it:

    \setupinteraction[state=start]
    \setuppapersize[A9]
    \starttext
    \attachment[xml-mkiv.pdf]\\
    \attachment[xml-mkiv.pdf]
        [symbol=Pushpin]\\
    \attachment[xml-mkiv.pdf]
        [symbol=Default]\\
    \stoptext

  /Rect [ 12.48609 117.54327 18.46039 123.51757 ]
  /Rect [ 12.48609 100.805667 54.306196 111.41602 ]
  /Rect [ 12.48609 88.58463 50.351209 97.11594 ]

Could it be possible that all /Rect entries for attachments are
calculated the same way (with a square of about 6×6), no matter which
symbol is used? At least, when no dimension is specified.

BTW, only one attachment is shown in each margin. It seems to be the
last one. I have just discovered it accidentally:

    \setupinteraction[state=start]
    \starttext
    one\attachment[file=onandon, location=inmargin]

    two (actually)\attachment[file=notnow, location=inmargin]%
        \attachment[file=about, location=rightmargin]%
        \attachment[file=onandon, location=leftmargin]%

    three\attachment[file=notnow, location=rightmargin]%
        \attachment[file=about, location=rightmargin]%
        \attachment[file=onandon, location=rightmargin]%

    four\attachment[file=about]\attachment[file=about]%
        \attachment[file=about]\attachment[file=about]
    \stoptext

Many thanks for your help,

Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________