From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/38743 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Aditya Mahajan Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Superscript text size Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:04:52 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <1200921285.47949ac5a8326@imp.free.fr> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1200938785 21339 80.91.229.12 (21 Jan 2008 18:06:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:06:25 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Mon Jan 21 19:06:44 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JH12a-0003pA-Mf for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:06:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87CBB1FB4E; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:06:09 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 08755-01-2; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:05:29 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEBC31FB12; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:05:28 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F50E1FB01 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:05:27 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 08755-01 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:04:56 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from skycaptain.mr.itd.umich.edu (smtp.mail.umich.edu [141.211.93.160]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79C921FB12 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:04:54 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: FROM adi-laptop.local (c-68-40-40-75.hsd1.mi.comcast.net [68.40.40.75]) BY skycaptain.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 4794DEC4.8786B.519 ; 21 Jan 2008 13:04:52 -0500 X-X-Sender: adityam@adi-laptop In-Reply-To: <1200921285.47949ac5a8326@imp.free.fr> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:38743 Archived-At: On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, morgan.brassel@free.fr wrote: > Hi, > > The superscript in expressions like $R^N$ seems to be typeset with a bigger font > size in ConTeXt than in LaTeX. Is it the wanted behaviour? From the typographic > point of view, which is the best of the two renderings? > > Thanks for your advice, That should not happen. I cannot see the different from my eyes. Here is my example. In both cases, bodyfont is 10pt, and scriptsize is 7pt. Do you see the differece? ConTeXT: \setupbodyfont[10pt] \starttext $R^N$ \stoptext LaTeX: \documentclass{minimal} \usepackage{lmodern} \begin{document} $R^N$ \end{document} ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________