From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/39859 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Aditya Mahajan Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: several details (maybe bugs) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 11:37:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <20080405080820899969.96931762@gmail.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1207410036 31588 80.91.229.12 (5 Apr 2008 15:40:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 15:40:36 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sat Apr 05 17:41:08 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JiAVv-0005ka-VE for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Apr 2008 17:41:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DCB41FCAF; Sat, 5 Apr 2008 17:40:29 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 32056-05-8; Sat, 5 Apr 2008 17:39:49 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF27B1FCB7; Sat, 5 Apr 2008 17:38:17 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B33E1FCB1 for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2008 17:38:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 31827-02-4 for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2008 17:37:40 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from hackers.mr.itd.umich.edu (smtp.mail.umich.edu [141.211.14.81]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51ED51FBB9 for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2008 17:37:40 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: FROM adi-laptop.local (c-68-40-40-75.hsd1.mi.comcast.net [68.40.40.75]) BY hackers.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 47F79CC1.10256.20830 ; 5 Apr 2008 11:37:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:39859 Archived-At: On Sat, 5 Apr 2008, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > Am 2008-04-05 um 17:08 schrieb David: >>> >>> (3) >>> \startitemize[n] >>> Numbered itemizations suddenly(?) start with 0 - as this may be >>> suitable for programmers, but it's, ehm, a bit unusual in every other >>> context. >> >> I don't have the final answer on this, but I have run into this >> "starts >> with zero" problem when my corresponding \stopitemize is missing or >> not >> in the correct place. > > Ah, sorry - I spoke too soon: > It happened only with "texexec --once" That is understandable. ConTeXt now allows \setupitemize[n,reverse] to set up numbers in the reverse order. This also means that ConTeXt needs to run two times to get the numbering right. Aditya ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________