On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote: > Le 12 avril à 19:53:27 Aditya Mahajan écrit notamment: > > | On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote: >> > | > Le 12 avril à 17:06:11 "Mojca Miklavec" écrit notamment: > | > > | > | For linux the binary should be OK, the proper version at least (the > | > | only missing/old ones are freebsd & sun at the moment). > | >> > | > | I didn't test it though. One question: does your first-setup update > | > | bin/texlua as well? Old texlua might be the culprit as well. Only > | > | guessing ... > | > > | > OK I downloaded by hand luatex for texmf-linux/bin and texlua for > | > bin/texlua, but it wasn't that. Something else is broken, I have exactly > | > the same error :-( >> > | What does luatex -v say? I sometimes get the error that you are > | getting if the PATH variable gets messed up. > > Here the whole thing (I see nothing about path though): > ................................................. > 18:58 jean@boldair /win/context/bin % luatex -v > This is LuaTeX, Version snapshot-0.25.1-2008032113 I meant that there could be two luatex in your $PATH, and the wrong one could be used (that happens with me sometimes). You are running this command from /win/context/bin (I am assuming that luatex lies in this directory). Do you get the same output when you run it from another directory? Aditya