From: Aditya Mahajan <adityam@umich.edu>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: PhD Thesis in ConTeXt
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:10:53 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0810212237400.3396@nqv-yncgbc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d0d404b60810211056w6e3868e0k3d2692e1d43553f0@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Piotr wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have spent some time with google in order to find an answer to the
> following questions. Unfortunatly, I was not satisfied with the
> answers, which I now hope to find here.
>
> It is my plan not to use the MS Office suite for the production of my
> PhD thesis (in chemistry). I have used Miktex some years ago during my
> studies for some project reports, and I remember beeing quite
> satisfied with the results. My Master thesis, on the other hand, I
> wrote in word.. and although I remember not having too many
> difficulties, there were some nasty obstacles to be overcome.
> Obstacles which I simply do not want to risk having repeated a second
> time on a much bigger scale.
> I this mailing list I read several reports of people who either had
> written their thesis in Latex or ConTeXt. There was a mention of Latex
> beeing designed for mathematic purposes, while ConTeXt was said to be
> better suited for the intergration of graphics or larger/more complex
> layout changes.
>
> 1) Finding the right context
> For now I had quite some difficulties to find that proper Latex
> distribution - a problem that actually led me to the existence of
> ConTeXt. I am wondering which latex distribution I should choose in
> order to work with ConTeXt? I am running Windows Vista (64-bit). Or is
> there a ConTeXt stand alone package that will absolutely satisfy my me
> in my needs? In principle, all I need is
>
> 2) The right editor
> What is the preferred editor for ConTeXt? for such a project? Is there
> any loss in functionality when using Texniccenter with ConTeXt than
> with MikTex instead?
Depends on what functions you need. There are a few editors which have
basic support for ConTeXt (compile document, view pdf, jump to error,
etc.). Hans uses Scite and includes a context enabled scite in the
windows distribution available on prama-ade.com. Irdis has written support
for Notepad++. Vim and emacs have some basic support. I do not know what
features texniccenter and winedit provide for context.
> 3) I have seen some thesis templates/examples in this mailinglist. Can
> anyone point me to additional sources regarding the creation of a PhD
> Thesis with ConTeXt?
Each institute has different requirements for phd thesis, so one template
is not going to fit the bill. I did my thesis in context, and you can have
a look at the sources and the output:
http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~adityam/publications/thesis/thesis.pdf
http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~adityam/publications/thesis/thesis.tar.gz
The easier way to go about this will be to look at the formatting
specifications of the thesis, and try to understand how to implement them
in context one by one.
> What is the advantage over Latex, what are the
> disadvantages? Is there a win-win distribution somewhere on the table?
Advantage: In most cases, others have written a style for what you want,
so you don't have to create a style on your own.
Disadvantage: When you do have to create a style on your own, it can be
difficult, even in packages which are supposed to be easy to configure
> 4) Has anyone used a typesetting suite like ContTeXt with CVS?
As others have said, the source files are simply text files. So you can
use any version control that you want.
> 5) Is the ConTeXt reference system compatible with Endnote?
I have no experience with endnote. I have seen endnote to bibtex
converters. If you can convert to bibtex, then using the references with
context is relatively easy.
> Is there any point to have latex installed, when context can do the
> trick?
As Mojca said, you may want to submit something to a journal which accepts
latex files.
> Or lets ask the devils advocate the other way around: What is
> the point of installing context, when latex could do the trick?
Again I agree with what Mojca said. If latex can do the job, use it. If
you are happy with one of the defaul latex styles, do not use too many
figures in your document, do not want text wrapping around figures, use
latex.
> Apart
> that I have to re-learn latex anyway.. what is better with Context?
Context has a more consistent interface to all the commands. This makes it
easier to remember how to configure things.
Aditya
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-22 3:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-21 17:56 Piotr
2008-10-21 18:58 ` Jeff Smith
2008-10-21 19:35 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2008-10-21 20:32 ` Diego Depaoli
2008-10-21 22:46 ` Marcin Borkowski
2008-10-22 5:31 ` emacs (was: Re: PhD Thesis in ConTeXt) Peter Münster
2008-10-22 6:18 ` Marcin Borkowski
2008-10-22 10:50 ` emacs Gour
2008-10-23 21:08 ` emacs Peter Münster
2008-10-23 22:46 ` emacs Marcin Borkowski
2009-02-05 15:06 ` emacs Peter Münster
2009-02-05 15:19 ` emacs luigi scarso
2009-02-05 19:15 ` emacs Peter Münster
2009-02-11 15:35 ` local footnotes Albrecht Kauffmann
2009-02-13 14:44 ` Thomas Floeren
2009-02-20 8:17 ` Albrecht Kauffmann
2009-02-20 10:28 ` Thomas Floeren
2009-02-24 7:37 ` Albrecht Kauffmann
2009-02-26 19:28 ` rulethickness in columns Albrecht Kauffmann
2009-03-01 18:26 ` Mojca Miklavec
2009-03-01 18:45 ` Hans Hagen
2009-03-02 10:19 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2009-03-02 10:41 ` Hans Hagen
2009-03-03 1:25 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2009-03-03 18:04 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2009-03-03 18:26 ` Hans Hagen
2009-03-03 18:44 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2009-03-03 18:29 ` Hans Hagen
2009-03-03 18:50 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2009-03-02 14:31 ` Mojca Miklavec
2009-03-02 14:58 ` Peter Rolf
2008-10-22 1:24 ` PhD Thesis in ConTeXt Mojca Miklavec
2008-10-22 3:10 ` Aditya Mahajan [this message]
2008-10-22 5:41 ` Alan BRASLAU
2008-10-28 1:29 ` Mohamed Bana
2008-10-28 15:20 ` Aditya Mahajan
2008-10-22 7:13 ` Stephen A. Tjemkes
2008-10-22 8:18 ` Steffen Wolfrum
2008-10-22 12:45 ` John Devereux
2008-10-22 18:53 ` Peter Münster
2008-10-22 20:52 ` Alan BRASLAU
2008-10-22 21:25 ` Aditya Mahajan
2008-10-23 14:37 ` Taco Hoekwater
2008-10-23 14:54 ` John Devereux
2008-10-23 15:38 ` Documentation (Re: PhD Thesis in ConTeXt) Taco Hoekwater
2008-10-23 18:09 ` Rory Molinari
2008-10-23 22:30 ` Marcin Borkowski
2008-10-24 7:18 ` luigi scarso
2008-10-23 21:27 ` documentation, was PhD Thesis in ConTeXt Alan BRASLAU
2008-10-23 22:21 ` Marcin Borkowski
2008-10-22 13:05 Piotr
2008-10-22 13:43 ` Marcin Borkowski
2008-10-23 17:34 ` Jeff Smith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.1.00.0810212237400.3396@nqv-yncgbc \
--to=adityam@umich.edu \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).