From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/45275 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Aditya Mahajan Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: MkII vs. MkIV Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 15:20:25 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <20081104200615.GA2264@atos.labs.wmid.amu.edu.pl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1225830150 5480 80.91.229.12 (4 Nov 2008 20:22:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 20:22:30 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Nov 04 21:23:30 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KxSQm-0000FT-QD for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:23:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8460D1FC44; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 21:22:07 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 20479-01-3; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 21:21:07 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0837B1FC01; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 21:21:07 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E251FC01 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 21:21:05 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 20479-01-2 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 21:20:29 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from skycaptain.mr.itd.umich.edu (smtp.mail.umich.edu [141.211.93.160]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9BC1FB57 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 21:20:29 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: FROM dhcp128036151030.central.yale.edu (dhcp128036151030.central.yale.edu [128.36.151.30]) BY skycaptain.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 4910AE8B.1D5FC.16453 ; 4 Nov 2008 15:20:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20081104200615.GA2264@atos.labs.wmid.amu.edu.pl> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:45275 Archived-At: On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Marcin Borkowski wrote: > Hi, > > Is it normal that output from MkII and MkIV are different in terms of > page breaks? Yes. In MKII the interline space is hard coded. MKIV gets the interline space from the font. So, you will get different page breaks. I experienced around 2-5 pages difference in a 100 page document. Aditya ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________