From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/58719 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Aditya Mahajan Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: 10+ reasons why I still use MKII Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 11:20:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="8323328-96797936-1273677604=:23519" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1273677607 19146 80.91.229.12 (12 May 2010 15:20:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 15:20:07 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed May 12 17:20:05 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OCDjA-0001gi-6s for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 May 2010 17:20:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D1FC9B80; Wed, 12 May 2010 17:19:59 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id wt3Jfo9V6SJ7; Wed, 12 May 2010 17:19:59 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A434C9B35; Wed, 12 May 2010 17:19:57 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235BBC9B35 for ; Wed, 12 May 2010 17:19:56 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id LviwpP9cLgG1 for ; Wed, 12 May 2010 17:19:53 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from hellskitchen.mr.itd.umich.edu (smtp.mail.umich.edu [141.211.14.82]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C99CC9B1A for ; Wed, 12 May 2010 17:19:52 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: FROM [192.168.2.8] (c-76-28-91-31.hsd1.ct.comcast.net [76.28.91.31]) By hellskitchen.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 4BEAC717.7770C.29624 ; Authuser adityam; 12 May 2010 11:19:51 EDT In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (LNX 1266 2009-07-14) X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:58719 Archived-At: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-96797936-1273677604=:23519 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Wed, 12 May 2010, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > 7.) I know that there's a longstanding left vs. right bug, but > flushleft is no solution in the following case (compare MKII and MKIV > again): > > \definedescription > [latexdesc] > [headstyle=3D{\ss\bf},style=3Dnormal,align=3Dleft,location=3Dhanging,wid= th=3Dfit,margin=3D0cm] > > \latexdesc{step E (expectation):} \input tufte > > \latexdesc{step M (maximization):} \input tufte Isn't MkIV output correct in this case? MkII is simply ignoring the align= =20 key. (Try with align=3Dmiddle) > 8.) > > \definetypeface [boldmath] [mm] [boldmath] [latin-modern] [default] > \starttext > $\boldsymbol{\theta}$ > \stoptext > > 9.) Note the big difference of when the formula starts vertically on page= : > > \starttext > \startformula > a+b > \stopformula > \stoptext > > 10.) Different square root shape/variant used: > > $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2=CF=80=CF=83_i^2}}$ > > Original formula: > \startformula > \startcases > \NC =CF=81_0, \NC for $i=3D0$, \NR > \NC =CF=81_i\,\frac{1}{\sqrt{2=CF=80=CF=83_i^2}} > \exp\biggl(-\frac{\left(x_j-=CE=BC_i\right)^2}{2=CF=83_i^2}\biggr),=20 > \NC for $i\in\left\{1,2\right\}$. \NR > \stopcases > \stopformula > but I cannot reproduce the big difference it makes in original document= =20 > on a smaller scale. Taco, is there a difference between the default math parameters for MkIV? > 13.) Different spacing > > \setupwhitespace[big] > \def\dictentry#1#2{\hbox{\bf#1}\hbox{\hbox to 1em{}\hbox{#2}}\blank[4mm]} > \starttext > \dictentry{clipping}{preboj} > \dictentry{clustering}{gru=C4=8Denje} > \stoptext Vertical spacing has been completely redone in MkIV. There is much more=20 control now, so you should be able to get MkII behavour, if that is what=20 you want in this case. > What's the following BEWARE useful for? > > systems : BEWARE: syntex functionality is enabled! A typo. That should say *synctex* and not *syntex*. See Synctex and Context at http://itexmac.sourceforge.net/SyncTeX.html Aditya --8323328-96797936-1273677604=:23519 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ --8323328-96797936-1273677604=:23519--