* A few puzzling problems (bugs?) with enumerations
@ 2010-10-13 10:08 Mathieu Boespflug
2010-10-13 10:57 ` Mathieu Boespflug
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Boespflug @ 2010-10-13 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Hi,
using the latest beta, I've had a bunch of problems using enumerations
in mkiv. Earlier betas have had the same problems. Consider the
following document:
\defineenumeration
[definition]
[ text=Definition,
title=yes,
list=all,
listtext={Definition }]
\defineenumeration
[theorem]
[ text=Theorem,
title=yes,
style=italic,
list=all,
number=definition,
listtext={Theorem }]
\defineenumeration
[proof]
[ text=Proof,
number=no,
headstyle=italic,
title=no,
closesymbol={\mathematics{\square}},
style=normal]
\starttext
blah blah
\startdefinition{foo}
body1
\stopdefinition
\startdefinition
body2
\stopdefinition
\startdefinition[-]
body3
\stopdefinition
\starttheorem
$P = NP$
\stoptheorem
\startproof
too long to fit here.
\stopproof
\section{Inside sections}
\subsection{Inside subsections}
\startdefinition{foo}
body1
\stopdefinition
\startdefinition
body2
\stopdefinition
\startdefinition[-]
body3
\stopdefinition
\starttheorem[thm:pnp]
$P = NP$
\stoptheorem
\startproof
too long to fit here.
\stopproof
Let's talk about \in{theorem}[thm:pnp].
\stoptext
I see five problems :
1. Even when the enumeration has no title, the parentheses appear.
Judging by Aditya's code in his MyWay on theorems, it used to be that
when there is no title, the parens don't appear. How do I recover this
behaviour?
2. I want the "theorem" enumeration to share its number with the
"definition" environment. That doesn't seem to work. Outside of any
section, the theorem just doesn't have any number. Inside a section,
the theorem very oddly displays the section number.
3. I want the "proof" enumeration to have no number. That doesn't
work inside a section. As for the "theorem" enumeration, the section
number is printed even though here i requested no number at all!
4. Suppressing the number for a specific enumeration using the [-]
switch doesn't work. As before, inside a section, the section number
appears instead of no number.
5. Citing a specific theorem using \in{theorem}[thm:pnp] doesn't show
the number of a theorem.
I'm guessing the last four points are all related.
Best regards,
Mathieu
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: A few puzzling problems (bugs?) with enumerations 2010-10-13 10:08 A few puzzling problems (bugs?) with enumerations Mathieu Boespflug @ 2010-10-13 10:57 ` Mathieu Boespflug 2010-10-15 8:20 ` Mathieu Boespflug 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Mathieu Boespflug @ 2010-10-13 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Also, I notice that the context reference manual from the svn repository at supelec has the same problem when built with the latest beta (p 241). -- Mathieu On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Mathieu Boespflug <0xbadcode@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > using the latest beta, I've had a bunch of problems using enumerations > in mkiv. Earlier betas have had the same problems. Consider the > following document: > > \defineenumeration > [definition] > [ text=Definition, > title=yes, > list=all, > listtext={Definition }] > > \defineenumeration > [theorem] > [ text=Theorem, > title=yes, > style=italic, > list=all, > number=definition, > listtext={Theorem }] > > \defineenumeration > [proof] > [ text=Proof, > number=no, > headstyle=italic, > title=no, > closesymbol={\mathematics{\square}}, > style=normal] > > \starttext > > blah blah > > \startdefinition{foo} > body1 > \stopdefinition > > \startdefinition > body2 > \stopdefinition > > \startdefinition[-] > body3 > \stopdefinition > > \starttheorem > $P = NP$ > \stoptheorem > \startproof > too long to fit here. > \stopproof > > \section{Inside sections} > > \subsection{Inside subsections} > > \startdefinition{foo} > body1 > \stopdefinition > > \startdefinition > body2 > \stopdefinition > > \startdefinition[-] > body3 > \stopdefinition > > \starttheorem[thm:pnp] > $P = NP$ > \stoptheorem > \startproof > too long to fit here. > \stopproof > > Let's talk about \in{theorem}[thm:pnp]. > > \stoptext > > I see five problems : > > 1. Even when the enumeration has no title, the parentheses appear. > Judging by Aditya's code in his MyWay on theorems, it used to be that > when there is no title, the parens don't appear. How do I recover this > behaviour? > > 2. I want the "theorem" enumeration to share its number with the > "definition" environment. That doesn't seem to work. Outside of any > section, the theorem just doesn't have any number. Inside a section, > the theorem very oddly displays the section number. > > 3. I want the "proof" enumeration to have no number. That doesn't > work inside a section. As for the "theorem" enumeration, the section > number is printed even though here i requested no number at all! > > 4. Suppressing the number for a specific enumeration using the [-] > switch doesn't work. As before, inside a section, the section number > appears instead of no number. > > 5. Citing a specific theorem using \in{theorem}[thm:pnp] doesn't show > the number of a theorem. > > I'm guessing the last four points are all related. > > Best regards, > > Mathieu > ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: A few puzzling problems (bugs?) with enumerations 2010-10-13 10:57 ` Mathieu Boespflug @ 2010-10-15 8:20 ` Mathieu Boespflug 2010-10-15 11:19 ` Wolfgang Schuster 2010-10-16 0:29 ` Aditya Mahajan 0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Mathieu Boespflug @ 2010-10-15 8:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Ok so after reading the source code of strc-des.mkiv, I found that contrary to earlier documentation such as http://www.ntg.nl/maps/36/09.pdf it is not the 'number' parameter that should be used to share numbering but the 'counter' parameter. After fixing that in my code, theorems now have proper numbers and references to theorems work properly too. However, \starttheorem[number=no] blah \stoptheorem and \starttheorem[-] blih \stoptheorem still don't work as expected inside sections, and I still have problem 1 listed in one of my previous emails, namely Any ideas? On a sidenote, I would like to contribute to the wiki or whatever is the main documentation source of the ConTeXt project something to document those parameters that are specific de \setupenumerations. The context reference manual and the wiki both just refer to \setupdescriptions yet there are a number of parameters that don't exist for \setupdescriptions, such as number, counter, prefix, prefixcomponents, etc. Many thanks, Mathieu On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Mathieu Boespflug <0xbadcode@gmail.com> wrote: > Also, I notice that the context reference manual from the svn > repository at supelec has the same problem when built with the latest > beta (p 241). > > -- Mathieu > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Mathieu Boespflug <0xbadcode@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> using the latest beta, I've had a bunch of problems using enumerations >> in mkiv. Earlier betas have had the same problems. Consider the >> following document: >> >> \defineenumeration >> [definition] >> [ text=Definition, >> title=yes, >> list=all, >> listtext={Definition }] >> >> \defineenumeration >> [theorem] >> [ text=Theorem, >> title=yes, >> style=italic, >> list=all, >> number=definition, >> listtext={Theorem }] >> >> \defineenumeration >> [proof] >> [ text=Proof, >> number=no, >> headstyle=italic, >> title=no, >> closesymbol={\mathematics{\square}}, >> style=normal] >> >> \starttext >> >> blah blah >> >> \startdefinition{foo} >> body1 >> \stopdefinition >> >> \startdefinition >> body2 >> \stopdefinition >> >> \startdefinition[-] >> body3 >> \stopdefinition >> >> \starttheorem >> $P = NP$ >> \stoptheorem >> \startproof >> too long to fit here. >> \stopproof >> >> \section{Inside sections} >> >> \subsection{Inside subsections} >> >> \startdefinition{foo} >> body1 >> \stopdefinition >> >> \startdefinition >> body2 >> \stopdefinition >> >> \startdefinition[-] >> body3 >> \stopdefinition >> >> \starttheorem[thm:pnp] >> $P = NP$ >> \stoptheorem >> \startproof >> too long to fit here. >> \stopproof >> >> Let's talk about \in{theorem}[thm:pnp]. >> >> \stoptext >> >> I see five problems : >> >> 1. Even when the enumeration has no title, the parentheses appear. >> Judging by Aditya's code in his MyWay on theorems, it used to be that >> when there is no title, the parens don't appear. How do I recover this >> behaviour? >> >> 2. I want the "theorem" enumeration to share its number with the >> "definition" environment. That doesn't seem to work. Outside of any >> section, the theorem just doesn't have any number. Inside a section, >> the theorem very oddly displays the section number. >> >> 3. I want the "proof" enumeration to have no number. That doesn't >> work inside a section. As for the "theorem" enumeration, the section >> number is printed even though here i requested no number at all! >> >> 4. Suppressing the number for a specific enumeration using the [-] >> switch doesn't work. As before, inside a section, the section number >> appears instead of no number. >> >> 5. Citing a specific theorem using \in{theorem}[thm:pnp] doesn't show >> the number of a theorem. >> >> I'm guessing the last four points are all related. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Mathieu >> > ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: A few puzzling problems (bugs?) with enumerations 2010-10-15 8:20 ` Mathieu Boespflug @ 2010-10-15 11:19 ` Wolfgang Schuster 2010-10-15 14:39 ` Mathieu Boespflug 2010-10-16 0:29 ` Aditya Mahajan 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Wolfgang Schuster @ 2010-10-15 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Am 15.10.2010 um 10:20 schrieb Mathieu Boespflug: > Ok so after reading the source code of strc-des.mkiv, I found that > contrary to earlier documentation such as > > http://www.ntg.nl/maps/36/09.pdf > > it is not the 'number' parameter that should be used to share > numbering but the 'counter' parameter. After fixing that in my code, > theorems now have proper numbers and references to theorems work > properly too. \unprotected\def\doenumerationextratext {\doif{\descriptionparameter\c!title}\v!yes {\doifsomething\@@dodoenumerationtext % WS: added this test {\begingroup \dosetdescriptionattributes\c!titlestyle\c!titlecolor \hskip\descriptionparameter\c!titledistance \descriptionparameter\c!titlecommand {\descriptionparameter\c!titleleft \begstrut\@@dodoenumerationtext\endstrut \descriptionparameter\c!titleright}% \endgroup}}} \unprotected\def\doenumerationfullnumber#1% text, title {\begingroup \dosetdescriptionattributes\c!headstyle\c!headcolor \the\everyenumeration %\descriptionparameter\c!command{\strut#1\doenumerationnumber\doenumerationextratext}% \descriptionparameter\c!command{\strut#1\ifconditional\enumerationnumberenabled\doenumerationnumber\fi\doenumerationextratext}% \endgroup} Wolfgang ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: A few puzzling problems (bugs?) with enumerations 2010-10-15 11:19 ` Wolfgang Schuster @ 2010-10-15 14:39 ` Mathieu Boespflug 2010-10-15 15:09 ` Arthur Reutenauer 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Mathieu Boespflug @ 2010-10-15 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Wow, thank you very much for your fix, Wolfgang! I can confirm that it works. I hope this fix makes it into the next beta? Abount documenting these extra parameters that \setupenumerations has over \setupdefinitions, I figure that I should contribute that to the wiki. But I wonder, how does this kind of user generated documentation on the wiki get synchronized with the ConTeXt Reference manual hosted at Supelec? -- Mathieu On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Wolfgang Schuster <schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Am 15.10.2010 um 10:20 schrieb Mathieu Boespflug: > >> Ok so after reading the source code of strc-des.mkiv, I found that >> contrary to earlier documentation such as >> >> http://www.ntg.nl/maps/36/09.pdf >> >> it is not the 'number' parameter that should be used to share >> numbering but the 'counter' parameter. After fixing that in my code, >> theorems now have proper numbers and references to theorems work >> properly too. > > \unprotected\def\doenumerationextratext > {\doif{\descriptionparameter\c!title}\v!yes > {\doifsomething\@@dodoenumerationtext % WS: added this test > {\begingroup > \dosetdescriptionattributes\c!titlestyle\c!titlecolor > \hskip\descriptionparameter\c!titledistance > \descriptionparameter\c!titlecommand > {\descriptionparameter\c!titleleft > \begstrut\@@dodoenumerationtext\endstrut > \descriptionparameter\c!titleright}% > \endgroup}}} > > \unprotected\def\doenumerationfullnumber#1% text, title > {\begingroup > \dosetdescriptionattributes\c!headstyle\c!headcolor > \the\everyenumeration > %\descriptionparameter\c!command{\strut#1\doenumerationnumber\doenumerationextratext}% > \descriptionparameter\c!command{\strut#1\ifconditional\enumerationnumberenabled\doenumerationnumber\fi\doenumerationextratext}% > \endgroup} > > Wolfgang > > > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net > archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: A few puzzling problems (bugs?) with enumerations 2010-10-15 14:39 ` Mathieu Boespflug @ 2010-10-15 15:09 ` Arthur Reutenauer 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Arthur Reutenauer @ 2010-10-15 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users > But I wonder, how does this kind of user generated documentation > on the wiki get synchronized with the ConTeXt Reference manual hosted > at Supelec? How do you think? There are little dwarves collecting the data and doing semantic analysis on it in order to update the reference manual periodically (every hour during business days, every third hours on week-ends and holidays, and once a day when the griffins are on strike protesting about their retirement plan). Seriously, it is manually edited, which is the only way to make a consistent document. For several years, there has been one single person writing it, namely Taco, and very few proofreaders, despite his repeated requests for feedback. This makes any progress verry difficult. And Taco is more of the elven kind anyway. Arthur ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: A few puzzling problems (bugs?) with enumerations 2010-10-15 8:20 ` Mathieu Boespflug 2010-10-15 11:19 ` Wolfgang Schuster @ 2010-10-16 0:29 ` Aditya Mahajan 2010-10-16 6:48 ` Peter Münster 2010-10-16 8:59 ` Hans Hagen 1 sibling, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Aditya Mahajan @ 2010-10-16 0:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users On Fri, 15 Oct 2010, Mathieu Boespflug wrote: > Ok so after reading the source code of strc-des.mkiv, I found that > contrary to earlier documentation such as > > http://www.ntg.nl/maps/36/09.pdf > > it is not the 'number' parameter that should be used to share > numbering but the 'counter' parameter. Partly my fault. I requested some of the features that are in that article but haven't really tested them in MkIV. > On a sidenote, I would like to contribute to the wiki or whatever is > the main documentation source of the ConTeXt project something to > document those parameters that are specific de \setupenumerations. The > context reference manual and the wiki both just refer to > \setupdescriptions yet there are a number of parameters that don't > exist for \setupdescriptions, such as number, counter, prefix, > prefixcomponents, etc. Adding the missing options to the wiki is a good start. Currently, there is no syncing between the wiki and the cont-en.xml file (in texmf-context/tex/context/interface) that was used to generate that content. You could simulaneously add the appropriate keys to cont-en.xml and send the diff file to Hans. (There were plans to reimplement that in lua, but I do not know what is the current state of it). It will be nice to have a comprehensive wiki page on enumerations. Aditya ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: A few puzzling problems (bugs?) with enumerations 2010-10-16 0:29 ` Aditya Mahajan @ 2010-10-16 6:48 ` Peter Münster 2010-10-16 8:59 ` Hans Hagen 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Peter Münster @ 2010-10-16 6:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users On Fri, Oct 15 2010, Aditya Mahajan wrote: > cont-en.xml and send the diff file to Hans. (There were plans to > reimplement that in lua, but I do not know what is the current state > of it). Early beginning stage. See also: http://foundry.supelec.fr/svn/contextman/context-commands Cheers, Peter -- Contact information: http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/ ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: A few puzzling problems (bugs?) with enumerations 2010-10-16 0:29 ` Aditya Mahajan 2010-10-16 6:48 ` Peter Münster @ 2010-10-16 8:59 ` Hans Hagen 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Hans Hagen @ 2010-10-16 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users On 16-10-2010 2:29, Aditya Mahajan wrote: > content. You could simulaneously add the appropriate keys to cont-en.xml > and send the diff file to Hans. (There were plans to reimplement that in > lua, but I do not know what is the current state of it). definitely not soon and the xml file will stay around anyway ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-10-16 8:59 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-10-13 10:08 A few puzzling problems (bugs?) with enumerations Mathieu Boespflug 2010-10-13 10:57 ` Mathieu Boespflug 2010-10-15 8:20 ` Mathieu Boespflug 2010-10-15 11:19 ` Wolfgang Schuster 2010-10-15 14:39 ` Mathieu Boespflug 2010-10-15 15:09 ` Arthur Reutenauer 2010-10-16 0:29 ` Aditya Mahajan 2010-10-16 6:48 ` Peter Münster 2010-10-16 8:59 ` Hans Hagen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).