From: Aditya Mahajan <adityam@umich.edu>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: Wiki: ConTeXt vs. LaTeX and others
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 12:43:36 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1011041239260.4438@ybpnyubfg.ybpnyqbznva> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <guraq7-ea4.ln1@news.jonasstein.de>
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Jonas Stein wrote:
> for many users it is interesting, to get an overview
> how problems are solved in ConTeXt compared to the other
> TeX-Flavours.
Also see http://wiki.contextgarden.net/From_LaTeX_to_ConTeXt and
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Latex_Packages
> I like the wikimatrix for Wikis and i thought it could be
> nice to have a simple matrix for TeX.
>
> I started a table in the wiki to collect this knowledge [2],
> but i am not very happy with this table yet.
I am not sure that such a table will be useful. Feature wise, latex and
context are almost equivalent. For a user it makes little difference if a
feature is standard or implmented in an external package.
> Perhaps do you have ideas, how to improve it?
Perhaps a better way is to update (and wikify) Berend de Boer's LaTeX in
proper ConTeXt.
Aditya
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-04 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-04 14:18 Jonas Stein
2010-11-04 16:43 ` Aditya Mahajan [this message]
2010-11-04 18:43 ` Vedran Miletić
2010-11-04 19:44 ` Philipp Gesang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.01.1011041239260.4438@ybpnyubfg.ybpnyqbznva \
--to=adityam@umich.edu \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).