>> In principle a cleaner implementation is possible in luatex (without using >> active characters), but I am not completely sure about this. It will be >> better to handle this as part of \mnum macro. >> > Hm, can you explain this a bit ? Currently ConTeXt already checks if '.' is part of a complete number or not as part of the export macros. For example: \m{x + 1.25y = 3.5} exports as 𝑥+1.25𝑦=3.5 Notice that 1.25 is part of a single tag. In contrast, if you use comma as a math delimiter, then the export function does not recognize the number correctly. \m{x + 1,25y = 3.5} exports as 𝑥+1,25𝑦=3,5 However, we do have a \mn macro (math number) to tag numbers. So you can type \m{x + \mn{1,25}y = \mn{3,5}} which exports as 𝑥+1,25𝑦=3,5 So, if we want to recognize ',' as a decimal separator, two solutions are possible in MkIV. The first is to build upon the existing export code that recognizes '.' as a decimal separator (to figure out the contents of the tag) to also recognize ',' as a decimal separator; The drawback of such an approach is that if you are in the habit of not adding a space after a comma, for example writing "Let $\naturalnumbers$ denote the set $\{1,2,3,\dots\}$ of natural numbers..." then you will get wrong output. So, an alternative option is to ask the user to tag all numbers with \mn. Then, the \mn{...} macro can redefine the comma so that the spaces around it match its use as a decimal separator. Aditya