From: Aditya Mahajan <adityam@umich.edu>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: Strange bug with reversed itemize
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 18:36:26 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.02.1209131831310.12157@qrpragenyvmrq> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.02.1209131212490.12131@qrpragenyvmrq>
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Otared Kavian wrote:
>
>> On 13 sept. 2012, at 02:34, Aditya Mahajan <adityam@umich.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> For some reason, the numbering in itemize is affected by the value of
>>> userpage!
>>>
>>> \setupuserpagenumber[start=12]
>>> \starttext
>>> \startitemize[n,reverse]
>>> \item One
>>> \item Two
>>> \stopitemize
>>> \stoptext
>>>
>>> With ConTeXt 2012.09.11 20:36 I get
>>>
>>> 13. One
>>> 12. Two
>>>
>>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Yes it is a strange behaviour and it appears only when using mkiv and
>> reversed itemize, even with
>> \setuppagenumber[start=12]
>> instead of
>> \setupuserpagenumber[start=12]
>> Also the pagenumber remains unchanged with either of these commands, which
>> means that it's a bug.
>>
>> I tested your example with Context version 2011.11.29, mkiv and there
>> everything is correct.
>
> Thanks for testing. I also tested with 2012.07.
I have been able to isolate the bug to the update on 2012.07.09;
specifically to this commit.
http://repo.or.cz/w/context.git/blobdiff/6f124794f7dc253f8b83f2517c26ce17e50d66ff..refs/heads/origin:/tex/context/base/strc-num.mkiv
If I replace the current version of strc-num.mkiv with the version from
2012.07.09:
http://repo.or.cz/w/context.git/blob_plain/6f124794f7dc253f8b83f2517c26ce17e50d66ff:/tex/context/base/strc-num.mkiv
then the numbering is correct.
However, I cannot figure out what is causing the bug in that change.
Aditya
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-13 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-13 0:34 Aditya Mahajan
2012-09-13 3:30 ` burwoad
2012-09-13 3:36 ` Aditya Mahajan
2012-09-13 7:59 ` Otared Kavian
2012-09-13 16:18 ` Aditya Mahajan
2012-09-13 22:36 ` Aditya Mahajan [this message]
2012-09-13 22:49 ` Aditya Mahajan
2012-09-13 23:11 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2012-09-14 22:06 ` Aditya Mahajan
2012-09-15 8:03 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2012-09-15 18:06 ` Aditya Mahajan
2012-09-16 10:52 ` Hans Hagen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.02.1209131831310.12157@qrpragenyvmrq \
--to=adityam@umich.edu \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).