From: Aditya Mahajan <adityam@umich.edu>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: ConTeXt standalone - in what situations is it better?
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:18:54 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.02.1310241015520.27245@ybpnyubfg.ybpnyqbznva> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131024101022.6c125cdd@localb.wexfordpress.net>
> The problem with Standalone is that the full range of fonts found with
> Texlive is not available. Standalone has 258 otf fonts and TexLive
> has 508 otf fonts. So I am opting for TeXLive, although I have both.
I use standalone in parallel with texlive (which I need for latex). In the
Arch PKGBUILD that I maintain, I use:
# If texlive exists, use fonts from texlive
if [ -d $_texlivefontdir ]
then
mkdir -p $srcdir/tex/texmf-fonts
if [ -L $srcdir/tex/texmf-fonts/fonts ]
then
rm $srcdir/tex/texmf-fonts/fonts
fi
ln -s $_texlivefontdir $srcdir/tex/texmf-fonts/fonts
fi
So, if TL is installed, the TL font directory is symlinked at an
appropriate location and all the TL fonts are available with ConTeXt
standalone as well.
> Another dfficulty is that many of the examples for simplefonts
> are apparently developed on a Windows system and I use Linux. Font
> names are different.
I haven't had any trouble with using simplefonts in Linux (but then, I
rarely consult the wiki for usage examples). Could you point to specific
examples.
Aditya
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-24 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-24 12:13 Lars Huttar
2013-10-24 12:57 ` Mojca Miklavec
2013-10-24 14:10 ` john Culleton
2013-10-24 14:18 ` Aditya Mahajan [this message]
2013-10-24 21:16 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2013-10-24 14:15 ` Aditya Mahajan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.02.1310241015520.27245@ybpnyubfg.ybpnyqbznva \
--to=adityam@umich.edu \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).