ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Math fractions
@ 2016-02-28 16:22 Aditya Mahajan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Aditya Mahajan @ 2016-02-28 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mailing list for ConTeXt users

Something is wrong in the current implmentation of \tfrac.

If we take away all the bells and whistles provided by 
\definemathfraction,

* \tfrac#1#2 should be equal to {\textstyle #2 \over #1}
* \dfrac#1#2 should be equal to {\displaystyle #2 \over #1}
* \frac should be equal to \tfrac in inline math and \dfrac in display 
math.

In the current implmentation \frac works correctly, but \tfrac does not. 
For example:

\startbuffer
   \frac 12 \tfrac 12 \dfrac 12
\stopbuffer

\starttext
$\getbuffer$
\startformula  \getbuffer \stopformula
\stoptext

The output of \frac and \dfrac is correct in both inline and display mode.

The output of \tfrac is wrong in both modes. In both modes, \tfrac should 
equal the current output of \frac in inline mode.

Although I don't completely understand the code, my guess is that there is 
a bug in how mathstyle=text is implemented (really, mathstyle=text should 
be equivalent to mathstyle=empty in inline math mode).

Thanks,
Aditya
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* math fractions
@ 2015-11-04 16:50 Alan BRASLAU
  2015-11-04 17:13 ` Wolfgang Schuster
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alan BRASLAU @ 2015-11-04 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mailing list for ConTeXt users

Hi,

Does anyone have a suggestion to generate a better result
for the symmetry specification:

\starttext
${2\over a}{2\over b}{2\over m}$
\stoptext

I tried:

\starttext
${2\over \vphantom{b}a}{2\over \vphantom{b}b}{2\over \vphantom{b}m}$
\stoptext

but this leaves too much vertical space - compare it to:

\starttext
${2\over \vphantom{b}a}{2\over b}{2\over \vphantom{b}m}$
\stoptext

Can this be a bug in ConTeXt math spacing?

Alan
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-28 16:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-02-28 16:22 Math fractions Aditya Mahajan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-11-04 16:50 math fractions Alan BRASLAU
2015-11-04 17:13 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2015-11-04 17:34   ` Alan BRASLAU

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).