From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/32235 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Aditya Mahajan Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context,gmane.linux.debian.devel.tetex Subject: Re: new debian context 2006.12.21-0.1 Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 11:03:08 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <20061219180411.GC10246@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <20061222100720.GK9611@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <86r6usnrze.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1166803414 4477 80.91.229.10 (22 Dec 2006 16:03:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:03:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Norbert Preining , debian-tex-maint@lists.debian.org Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Dec 22 17:03:31 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Gxmrr-00036L-DN for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:03:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B20AD201BB; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:02:13 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 10761-06-9; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:02:04 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 220C4201AC; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:02:04 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C9E201B3 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:02:03 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 10761-06-8 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:01:56 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from tombraider.mr.itd.umich.edu (smtp.mail.umich.edu [141.211.93.161]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id DF184201A3 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:01:55 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: FROM aditya.annarb01.mi.comcast.net (c-68-40-50-205.hsd1.mi.comcast.net [68.40.50.205]) BY tombraider.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 458C01BD.9B0F5.12541 ; 22 Dec 2006 11:03:10 -0500 Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: <86r6usnrze.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:32235 gmane.linux.debian.devel.tetex:19957 Archived-At: On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Frank K=FCster wrote: > And, in particular, something which explains in 5 lines why one would > want to use ConTeXt instead of LaTeX. The ConTeXt FAQ answers this question. The first one is a complete = explanation by Brooks Moses on c.t.t. while the second is a 5 line = explanation by Berend de Boer in LaTeX in proper ConTeXt. What are the differences between ConTeXt and LaTeX? = http://wiki.contextgarden.net/FAQ#What_are_the_differences_between_ConTeXt_= and_LaTeX.3F What are the advantages of ConTeXt over LaTeX? http://wiki.contextgarden.net/FAQ#What_are_the_advantages_of_ConTeXt_over_L= aTeX.3F Aditya