From: Aditya Mahajan <adityam@umich.edu>
Subject: Re: Problems with "mathalign"
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:18:12 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.WNT.0.81.0701031412110.3452@nqvgln> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6faad9f00701030931l59be89a8y5a6cc5e14ebdcc70@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wanted to keep Aditya busy now that he finished his wonderful new
> module ;), so ...
>
>
> I first wanted to ask how to number subformulas in a certain way, but
> that I figured out that numbering is already causing some problems on
> its own.
>
>
> Consider the following examples:
>
> \starttext
>
> This is almost OK, but has one formula number too much here:
>
> \startbuffer
> \placeformula
> \startformula
> \startalign[m=2,distance=3cm]
> a & =b
> & A & =B \\
> c & =d
> & C & =D \\
> \stopalign
> \stopformula
> \stopbuffer
> \typebuffer
> \getbuffer
Do not use the latex syntax.
> This results in a very weird formula numbering
Something is broken. AFAIK, this should not give you any number.
> \startbuffer
> \placeformula
> \startformula
> \startalign[m=2,distance=3cm]
> \NC a \NC =b
> \NC A \NC =B \NR
> \NC c \NC =d
> \NC C \NC =D \NR
> \stopalign
> \stopformula
> \stopbuffer
> \typebuffer
> \getbuffer
>
> Adding [+] helps, but than we have the same problem as at the beginning:
Adding [+] is necessary.
> \startbuffer
> \placeformula
> \startformula
> \startalign[m=2,distance=3cm]
> \NC a \NC =b
> \NC A \NC =B \NR[+]
> \NC c \NC =d
> \NC C \NC =D \NR[+]
> \stopalign
> \stopformula
> \stopbuffer
> \typebuffer
> \getbuffer
I can confirm that there is an extra number. I do not know what is
causing this. I am not aware of anything in core-mat has changed.
I compiled My Way on mathalign, and everything has an extra number.
hmm...
> Without placeforumla, but with [+] we don't get any numbering at all:
Yes you need the placefurmula.
>
> \startbuffer
> \startformula
> \startalign[m=2,distance=3cm]
> \NC a \NC =b
> \NC A \NC =B \NR[+]
> \NC c \NC =d
> \NC C \NC =D \NR[+]
> \stopalign
> \stopformula
> \stopbuffer
> \typebuffer
> \getbuffer
>
> \stoptext
>
> CtxTools | context version: 2006.12.27 11:34
> (After running "ctxtools --update" I just managed to break everything.)
>
> Any clue?
Something is broken.
Aditya
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-03 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-03 17:31 Mojca Miklavec
2007-01-03 19:18 ` Aditya Mahajan [this message]
2007-01-03 20:15 ` Taco Hoekwater
2007-02-19 21:24 ` Wim Neimeijer
2007-02-20 0:53 ` Aditya Mahajan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.WNT.0.81.0701031412110.3452@nqvgln \
--to=adityam@umich.edu \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).