From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/19726 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Henning Hraban Ramm Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: confused on which table Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 13:26:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20050409073259.GA368@localhost.localdomain> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1113132231 1224 80.91.229.2 (10 Apr 2005 11:23:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 11:23:51 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sun Apr 10 13:23:46 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DKaXE-0001kp-8x for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 13:23:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B77D127E5; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 13:26:08 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 17545-02; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 13:26:06 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA673127C3; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 13:26:06 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B849127C3 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 13:26:05 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 17470-03 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 13:26:04 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CFAD127AA for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 13:26:04 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from 158.17.78.83.cust.bluewin.ch[83.78.17.158] (helo=[192.168.1.3]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKwpI-1DKaZo0lFM-0006Gc; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 13:26:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20050409073259.GA368@localhost.localdomain> Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:033f42bdb3cd4a3c9b0966e414a370c7 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:19726 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:19726 Am 09.04.2005 um 09:33 schrieb Paul Tremblay: > Yet on looking at all of the different types of tables, I can't = exactly > see which ones are deprecated. Are any deprecated? Hard to say (even if I wrote that text). Better don't use "table(s)" any more. > I also see that there are three different types of tables for spanning > across pages ("\starttablehead", "\bTABLE", and "\startlinetable"). Do > each of these have strengths and weaknesses? TABLE should be actual best, linetable will be best sometime, but is still hardly documented (please prove me wrong). Gr=FC=DFlis vom Hraban! --- http://www.fiee.net/texnique/ http://contextgarden.net=