From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from cgl.ntg.nl (Cgl.ntg.nl [5.39.185.202]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A3221473 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 18:08:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91CE64847E6 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 18:07:10 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cgl.ntg.nl Authentication-Results: cgl.ntg.nl (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com Received: from cgl.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cgl.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QCTjEHmfA0uI for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 18:07:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cgl.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6D6484783 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 18:05:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73704484710 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 18:05:00 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cgl.ntg.nl Received: from cgl.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cgl.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z9cQAGPB3Qih for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 18:05:00 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.208.47; helo=mail-ed1-f47.google.com; envelope-from=wolfgang.schuster.lists@gmail.com; receiver= Received: from mail-ed1-f47.google.com (mail-ed1-f47.google.com [209.85.208.47]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ADFE48470E for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 18:04:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ed1-f47.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-56e78970853so9527523a12.0 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 09:04:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1714406699; x=1715011499; darn=ntg.nl; h=content-language:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version :user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=leiMGrfaPXxoHEIlLhGg6lbvAv8AOCRHDUw2hmch494=; b=DSGz68ez933ueHyIR8YJ2HHJxlGn/erwZ7ITz++SZjM9Ohm7MzbfTS/0/Lp2O8cyKc AeJf3Eerrs/qTt6EtFymvxXphv0oZp/L9si2apeQ5iidB0KgmS6YFFkQuB2nC5Ywypwu cr3XeHr+2cjSQWtYLx9xdjvWwe4CxG5RuxIuiUYB5tMvfD+Kgbfn6HpbkvFFhS/2OGtt gUSRRD5dql4GuyRKPV98hNotaQ+SXzACs/cHP84dxfagiVf5P8iG+NsSxgG1+0NHbUvL hlBCNxTjTe71n7vY57hnnxNBKwCbTvblh0w0z77t6FqlZ2v+CmAJOsvl9t1QyvkO6SGK PnfA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1714406699; x=1715011499; h=content-language:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version :user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=leiMGrfaPXxoHEIlLhGg6lbvAv8AOCRHDUw2hmch494=; b=NjO1KJP3zAz/YQqyJqWc2bPozsW3hWUp44gHCR3Xa4rLxy8csXKqUMM68w7/4fGPMh LECU5uJXGquEjQLN3pZV1cHyLgo49yuHtv44QdMrkcPMUFIcpxouNDuEPwX7QWFo/ATP /f7srQZEw7h6u93OeTwvBz+FtE5GV/8UMhsblrNQi4x97SP1lVH2FlH6bA1TYEr7rbJC aCO7oqZudIVrbIzXfzViV5hY3dR9elMbk9G2aCuo+YsB/WVZOr2+9/PbwHLaywj7cmcX OB9JPAQ9L3eJeedpqsQVxT6exzEKz8vbFWhO9o7/bWpEo71/l2/7AlZwlgTBchO+gONQ gbHg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxJSRDn6qeeC6OD9DwvPS15vOZT0TEnPDzf7dEPARqFOsVhAXtl PB2CVsa/3AhvGqnMKQu1TMqCFO2aPLNW2z8plKW4TrFtDh0yoFhE X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IECDNHBNUBAJM7OKVUCSBzbVBmRqN+iL8ye0XfFdO/QhRpa85t/YAojX2Mfu08KMHCtOlrNMg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f359:b0:a58:eb0d:f2a6 with SMTP id hg25-20020a170906f35900b00a58eb0df2a6mr45860ejb.31.1714406699137; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 09:04:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:810d:a8bf:dc10::3322? ([2a02:810d:a8bf:dc10::3322]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jw9-20020a170906e94900b00a58f4eff37asm2266146ejb.200.2024.04.29.09.04.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Apr 2024 09:04:58 -0700 (PDT) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users , Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context References: <3950da22-fd1e-6cd7-23e8-fca463fcd96c@gmx.es> From: Wolfgang Schuster Message-ID: Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 18:04:55 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/7.0.60 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3950da22-fd1e-6cd7-23e8-fca463fcd96c@gmx.es> Content-Language: en-US Message-ID-Hash: SPC6OGCMZELE4KLT5K6YMH45ANZINTDO X-Message-ID-Hash: SPC6OGCMZELE4KLT5K6YMH45ANZINTDO X-MailFrom: wolfgang.schuster.lists@gmail.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: Pablo Rodriguez X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.8 Precedence: list Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Subject: [NTG-context] Re: unprotecting when defining in Lua List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context schrieb am 29.04.2024 um 17:22: > Dear list, > > I have the following sample: > > \starttext > \startluacode > function document.test(str) > context(str) > end > > interfaces.definecommand { > name = "testing", > protected = false, > macro = document.test, > } > \stopluacode > > \meaningfull\testing > > \def\test#1{#1} > > \meaningfull\test > \stoptext > > Which is the right way to use "interfaces.definecommand" to get a simple > command as in standard TeX? > > I mean, no a non \permanent or non \protected command. You can't create unprotected command with interfaces.definecommand but this not a problem because you can just use interfaces.implement to create your command which is then unprotected by default. Using implement instead of definecommand doesn't matter because definecommand is just a wrapper for the implement function with the option to create a environment. Wolfgang ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror) archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________