On 2022-12-16 17:07, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote: > On 12/16/2022 10:08 PM, Rik Kabel via ntg-context wrote: >> Hans, >> >> Here are the stats for a 346 page book. Fonts are all cached. >> Compilation is via a make file which processes this as: >> >>     context --noconsole --overloadmode=error --batchmode --nonstopmode >>     --nosynctex misquotation_bodyonly.mkvi > nul >> >> and is run under W11 x64 on an i7-8550U. The only tables are contents > > ok, not the fastest i7 out there, more the tablet one, right? > >> and acronyms, and such, nothing complex. No graphics. Compact fonts >> are enabled. > > can you check compact mode .. when compact fonts are not enabled, do > you get the same > > >     mkiv lua stats  > font engine: otf 3.131, afm 1.513, tfm 1.000, 84 > >     instances, 67 shared in backend, 3 common vectors, 64 common > hashes, > > i wonder why so many instances > >>     mkiv lua stats  > node memory usage: 6869 attribute, 4608 dir, 4612 >>     glue, 84 gluespec, 2304 glyph, 3072 hlist, 3 kern, 647 mathspec, 5 >>     penalty, 2 temp > > this is suspicious ... i fixed a dir leak recently but having 3K boxes > dangling ... > >> In neither case do the sum of the times listed in the stats come >> close to the total runtime (in the second example, 14.774 seconds of >> 23.057 are accounted), so there are other unidentified processes >> involved. > > these stats are an indication because below a threshold (time > accuracy) nothing is measured > >> In any case, the processing time has been improving greatly over the >> last couple of years, and LMTX is significantly faster that MkIV in >> all of my work. > sure, that is to be expected although it depends a bit on the use > case, for instance the backend is slower (but does much more) so > initially lmtx was actually slower but at some point we started > gaining (and i can probably gain a little more) > > i wonder why directions bump time because much of what tex does is > sort of agnostic for directions (the backend needs more time but i > don't see that in your stats) > > when you run with --profile you get a much slower run but might get > some info from the extra log > > Hans > The laptop was hot stuff in 2017 with 16GB RAM, 1TB SSD, and a 4K touch screen -- today, not so hot. Due to be replaced next year. Here are the numbers without compact fonts enabled. Not much difference. mkiv lua stats  > used config file: selfautoparent:/texmf/web2c/texmfcnf.lua mkiv lua stats  > used cache path: C:/ConTeXt_LMTX/tex/texmf-cache/luametatex-cache/context/5fe67e0bfe781ce0dde776fb1556f32e mkiv lua stats  > resource resolver: loadtime 0.045 seconds, 1 scans with scantime 0.037 seconds, 0 shared scans, 37 found files, scanned paths: C:/Users/micro/texmf mkiv lua stats  > stored bytecode data: 507 modules (0.243 sec), 106 tables (0.016 sec), 613 chunks (0.259 sec) mkiv lua stats  > traced context: maxstack: 4107, freed: 2452, unreachable: 1655 mkiv lua stats  > cleaned up reserved nodes: 78 nodes, 8 lists of 438 mkiv lua stats  > node memory usage: 6869 attribute, 4608 dir, 4612 glue, 84 gluespec, 2304 glyph, 3072 hlist, 3 kern, 647 mathspec, 5 penalty, 2 temp mkiv lua stats  > node list callback tasks: 13 unique task lists, 37 instances (re)created, 87130 calls mkiv lua stats  > h-node processing time: 3.454 seconds including kernel mkiv lua stats  > inserted spaces in output: 106016 mkiv lua stats  > attribute processing time: 0.295 seconds front- and backend mkiv lua stats  > driver time: 2.487 seconds mkiv lua stats  > used backend: pdf mkiv lua stats  > jobdata time: 0.290 seconds saving, 0.053 seconds loading mkiv lua stats  > callbacks: file: 34388, saved: 191153, direct: 8, function: 173574, value: 345, message: 0, bytecode: 613, late 0, total: 400081 (1184 per page) mkiv lua stats  > randomizer: resumed with value 0.88558194690977 mkiv lua stats  > v-node processing time: 0.250 seconds mkiv lua stats  > loaded patterns: agr:gr:62 cn::58 de::3 deo:de:9 en::1 es::64 fr::63 it::66 la::67 ru::22, load time: 0.000 mkiv lua stats  > structure elements: 28145 element chains identified mkiv lua stats  > interactive elements: 3982 references, 4873 destinations mkiv lua stats  > margin data: 497 entries, 0 pending mkiv lua stats  > loaded fonts: 14 files: antykwatorunska-bold.otf, antykwatorunskacond-bold.otf, antykwatorunskacond-regular.otf, libertinusmath-regular.otf, libertinusmono-regular.otf, libertinussans-italic.otf, libertinussans-regular.otf, libertinusserif-italic.otf, libertinusserif-regular.otf, libertinusserif-semibold.otf, zentb___.otf, keteraramtsova.ttf, msjh.ttc, times.ttf mkiv lua stats  > font engine: otf 3.131, afm 1.513, tfm 1.000, 84 instances, 67 shared in backend, 3 common vectors, 64 common hashes, load time 1.076 seconds mkiv lua stats  > text directions: 4.987 seconds mkiv lua stats  > math tweaking time: 0.187 seconds, 18 math goodie tables mkiv lua stats  > pdf annotations: 3982 links (3982 unique), 0 special mkiv lua stats  > font embedding time: 0.195 seconds, 13 fonts mkiv lua stats  > result saved in file: misquotation_bodyonly.pdf, compresslevel 1, objectcompresslevel 3 mkiv lua stats  > positions: 4034 collected, 1722 deltas, 4025 shared partials, 112 partial entries mkiv lua stats  > used platform: win64, type: windows, binary subtree: texmf-win64 mkiv lua stats  > used engine: luametatex version: 2.1004, functionality level: 20221214, format id: 679, compiler: gcc mkiv lua stats  > tex properties: 740852 hash slots used of 2097152, 51846 control sequences, approximate memory usage: 73 MB mkiv lua stats  > lua properties: engine: lua 5.4, used memory: 314 MB, ctx: 288 MB, max: 288 MB, symbol mask: utf (τεχ) mkiv lua stats  > runtime: 23.731 seconds, 338 processed pages, 338 shipped pages, 14.243 pages/second I do have some macros that are likely to make you (and others who are more adept at such things) cringe. Happy to share more of the source if it is helpful. I have also run with --profile and have attached that log as well as the complete execution log (zipped together as logs.zip). -- Rik