From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/14831 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Wachter Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Can itemize calculate optimal label widths? Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:22:03 +0100 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: References: <6.0.1.1.2.20040223001605.01dbf0d8@localhost> Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1077809180 17772 80.91.224.253 (26 Feb 2004 15:26:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:26:20 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Thu Feb 26 16:25:52 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AwNOZ-0001OI-00 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:25:52 +0100 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C78F10B2A; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:23:48 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E7910B26 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:22:24 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AwNN9-0001zu-00 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:24:23 +0100 Original-Received: from p508b3e3c.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.139.62.60]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu Feb 26 15:24:23 2004 Original-Received: from stefan.wachter by p508b3e3c.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu Feb 26 15:24:23 2004 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl Original-Lines: 37 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p508b3e3c.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030425 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <6.0.1.1.2.20040223001605.01dbf0d8@localhost> Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:14831 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:14831 Hans Hagen wrote: > At 10:18 20/02/2004, you wrote: > >> Hi all! >> >> Is there a possiblity to have itemize calculate the optimal label >> width itself? I have an itemize that has rather different labels, e.g.: >> >> \startitemize >> \sym{1.} An item >> \sym{2.} Another item >> \sym{103 a.} An item with a very broad label >> \stopitemize >> >> In this example the label "103 a." flows into the item text. It would >> be great if itemize would automatically use a label width that fits >> the broadest label. > > > for the moment use: > > \startitemize[2*broad] > > and remind me in a few couple of weeks (months); it's on my mental to-do > list (not that hard to implement probably) > > Hans Ok - thanks for the reply. Is there a (TeX-)dimension for the label width available? In other words: by which amount is the current text area narrowed after an item has started? --Stefan