From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/15414
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Stefan Wachter <stefan.wachter@gmx.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context
Subject: Can \note repeat its footnote?
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:01:34 +0200
Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl
Message-ID: <cas2te$9jc$1@sea.gmane.org>
Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1087475597 10245 80.91.224.253 (17 Jun 2004 12:33:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 12:33:17 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Thu Jun 17 14:33:10 2004
Return-path: <ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl>
Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl)
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Baw4s-0000lA-00
	for <gctc-ntg-context-518@gmane.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:33:10 +0200
Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 09A85118C9; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:33:06 +0200 (MEST)
Original-Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249])
	by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C2810AE6
	for <ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl>; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:30:45 +0200 (MEST)
Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Baw2W-0001lb-00
	for <ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl>; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:30:44 +0200
Original-Received: from p508a3e6d.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.138.62.109])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl>; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:30:44 +0200
Original-Received: from stefan.wachter by p508a3e6d.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl>; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:30:44 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
Original-To: ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl
Original-Lines: 9
Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p508a3e6d.dip.t-dialin.net
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl
X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:ntg-context-request@ntg.nl?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context>,
	<mailto:ntg-context-request@ntg.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context.ntg.nl>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context>,
	<mailto:ntg-context-request@ntg.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:15414
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:15414

Hi all!

The \note[xxx] command is used to reference a previously defined 
footnote. Is it possible that the previously defined footnote is 
repeated if a page break had occured between the \footnote[xxx]{bla bla 
bla} and the corresponding \note[xxx] command?

Thanks for your attention,
--Stefan