From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/25608 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nikolai Weibull Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: ConTeXt IRC ? Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:59:37 +0100 Message-ID: References: <43D9F345.7080404@nibua-r.org> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138372072 2303 80.91.229.2 (27 Jan 2006 14:27:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:27:52 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Jan 27 15:27:41 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F2UZg-0002F8-Da for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:27:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B883127F1; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:27:40 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 29713-05; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:27:39 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 685741281B; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:59:42 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5460C1281B for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:59:40 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 29561-04-2 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:59:39 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.196]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 32BEA127FF for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:59:38 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i26so333944wxd for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 05:59:38 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.70.33.5 with SMTP id g5mr77222wxg; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 05:59:37 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.70.13.3 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 05:59:37 -0800 (PST) Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:25608 Archived-At: On 1/27/06, Nikolai Weibull wrote: > On 1/27/06, VnPenguin wrote: > > On 1/27/06, Nikolai Weibull wrote: > > > On 1/27/06, Renaud AUBIN wrote: > > > > Is there a context-related irc channel ? > > > > > > If there isn't but someone's going to create one now, please do so > > > on EFNet; thanks. > > > > Freenode.net is good too IMHO. > > No, it is not. There's no reason for Freenode to exist. It's just a > bunch of "reimplementers" who wanted their own chatnet...only gimpnet > is lamer. EFNet has always worked fine, is well-established, has > servers world-wine, and then some people think, "hey, lets create > another DALnet but with a free-software attitude"... > > Just my incredbly unhumble opinion... Wow. Sorry. I really flew off the handle there. I hope no one was too offended. I really didn't mean to get off like that. I need to start leaving my mail in "Drafts" a while before sending them off. I guess I had a stranger opinion about Freenode than I myself realized. Again, sorry for lashing out like that. nikolai