ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: andrea valle <valle@di.unito.it>
Subject: Re: lilypond inclusion + pdf crop
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 15:23:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e1b8488f7492c860bdf168a3af5573fc@di.unito.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <432BFD4B.1020004@creutzig.de>

Sorry if it seemed exoteric, but my idea was simply to show some 
typographical results, not to present a composition (an argument surely 
OT).
The idea is that the performer (a pianist, even if notation is generic) 
choose a starting point, execute the notation in the chosen vertex, 
choose an edge, wait for the duration indicated in the label on the 
edge, and executed the reached vertex. Duration is ad libitum.
All the compositional parameters change in relation to space position 
of each vertex. So it's like exploring different sound spaces (in the 
geographic sense) with specific morphologies.

I use a slightly more advanced  system typically for electronic 
composition (here there's a paper in case of interest:
www.di.unito.it/~vincenzo/drafts/Valle-Lombardo-CIM03.pdf).

This is the general structure, then each piece has different, specific, 
particularities both in terms of mapping, either in terms of 
performance instructions (e.g.  in nodi-II there's no duration 
indicated in the vertices, the way one "waits" for the duration of edge 
label change between the two pieces, etc.).

Typically I score out the result of a system run. In this case, I want 
to experiment with the collaboration of my friend pianist, who is a 
very good musician in the broadest sense. The pieces are very open in 
some sense, but in other are very "close".

-a-


On 17 Sep 2005, at 13:26, Christopher Creutzig wrote:

> Hans Hagen wrote:
>> andrea valle wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Here are two of the resulting scores (not totally finished yet)
>>> www.semiotiche.it/andrea/membrana/nodi-I.pdf
>>> www.semiotiche.it/andrea/membrana/nodi-II.pdf
>>>
>>> and one of the context file
>>> www.semiotiche.it/andrea/membrana/nodi-I.tex
>>
>>
>> impressive
>
>  I agree (from the optical point of view), but could you include a 
> short
> English explanation about which paths may be followed, what their 
> labels
> mean, if the position of the fragments conveys information, how many
> instruments are playing at once etc.?  I'm afraid I simply don't
> understand the notation as is.
>
>
> Christopher
> _______________________________________________
> ntg-context mailing list
> ntg-context@ntg.nl
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
>
>
Andrea Valle
Laboratorio multimediale "G. Quazza"
Facoltà di Scienze della Formazione
Università degli Studi di Torino
andrea.valle@unito.it

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-17 13:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-15  9:49 lilypond inclusion Christopher Creutzig
2005-09-15 10:35 ` Hans Hagen
2005-09-15 13:07   ` Christopher Creutzig
2005-09-15 13:53     ` Hans Hagen
2005-09-15 14:34 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2005-09-15 21:00   ` andrea valle
2005-09-16  0:37     ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2005-09-16 14:13       ` lilypond inclusion + pdf crop andrea valle
2005-09-16 15:25         ` [OT] " luigi.scarso
2005-09-16 15:29         ` Hans Hagen
2005-09-16 17:18           ` Willi Egger
2005-09-16 21:08           ` andrea valle
2005-09-18 19:38             ` Hans Hagen
2005-09-19  9:51               ` Taco Hoekwater
2005-09-17 11:26           ` Christopher Creutzig
2005-09-17 13:23             ` andrea valle [this message]
2005-09-16 16:23         ` lilypond inclusion + pdf crop (getting off-topic) Adam Lindsay
2005-09-16 17:37           ` Hans Hagen
2005-09-17  9:28             ` Re[2]: " Giuseppe Bilotta
2005-09-18 18:23               ` Hans Hagen
2005-09-18 19:19                 ` Re[2]: " Giuseppe Bilotta
2005-09-16 15:40     ` lilypond inclusion Christopher Creutzig
2005-09-16 16:10       ` andrea valle
2005-09-16 15:42   ` Christopher Creutzig
2005-09-16 16:39     ` Patrick Gundlach
2005-09-16 16:56 ` Mojca Miklavec
2005-09-16 17:45   ` Hans Hagen
2005-09-16 18:51   ` Christopher Creutzig
2005-09-16 19:20     ` Mojca Miklavec
2005-09-16 19:45       ` Hans Hagen
2005-09-16 20:25         ` Mojca Miklavec
2005-09-18 18:07           ` Hans Hagen
2005-09-16 20:46       ` Christopher Creutzig
2005-09-18 18:09         ` Hans Hagen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e1b8488f7492c860bdf168a3af5573fc@di.unito.it \
    --to=valle@di.unito.it \
    --cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).