* [NTG-context] XRechnung @ 2023-11-10 8:37 juh+ntg-context--- via ntg-context 2023-11-10 10:29 ` [NTG-context] XRechnung Henning Hraban Ramm 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: juh+ntg-context--- via ntg-context @ 2023-11-10 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users; +Cc: juh+ntg-context Hi, does anyone produce the XML-based invoice called XRechnung with ConTeXt? I don't know if XRechnung is the european name or only used in Germany? juh ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror) archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [NTG-context] Re: XRechnung 2023-11-10 8:37 [NTG-context] XRechnung juh+ntg-context--- via ntg-context @ 2023-11-10 10:29 ` Henning Hraban Ramm 2023-11-10 17:07 ` Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Henning Hraban Ramm @ 2023-11-10 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: juh+ntg-context--- via ntg-context Am 10.11.23 um 09:37 schrieb juh+ntg-context--- via ntg-context: > Hi, > > does anyone produce the XML-based invoice called XRechnung with ConTeXt? > I don't know if XRechnung is the european name or only used in Germany? In German it’s ZUGFeRD, the international name is Factur-X: https://www.pdf-tools.com/pdf-knowledge/zugferd-standard-electronic-invoices/ I always wanted to implement it, but never actually tried. It’s based on PDF/A, and I’m not sure about the proper workflow to get that. Hraban ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror) archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [NTG-context] Re: XRechnung 2023-11-10 10:29 ` [NTG-context] XRechnung Henning Hraban Ramm @ 2023-11-10 17:07 ` Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context 2023-11-10 17:47 ` Henning Hraban Ramm 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context @ 2023-11-10 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ntg-context; +Cc: Pablo Rodriguez On 11/10/23 11:29, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > Am 10.11.23 um 09:37 schrieb juh+ntg-context--- via ntg-context: >> Hi, >> >> does anyone produce the XML-based invoice called XRechnung with ConTeXt? >> I don't know if XRechnung is the european name or only used in Germany? > > In German it’s ZUGFeRD, the international name is Factur-X: > https://www.pdf-tools.com/pdf-knowledge/zugferd-standard-electronic-invoices/ According to https://www.ferd-net.de/standards/zugferd/, they may even be two different things (but I haven’t checked it). > I always wanted to implement it, but never actually tried. > It’s based on PDF/A, and I’m not sure about the proper workflow to get that. Someone told some time ago that https://github.com/speedata/publisher implements ZugFeRD. Again, no idea how or to which extent. https://zugferd.github.io/ provides more info. Version 2 of ZUGFeRD seems to be Factur-X (according to them). If you allow me the pun (as a foreigner and non-native speaker), the name seems to be too near to something like »Zug-Pferd« (I know it is nonsense in German, but ZUGFeRD seems the name for an act or a regulation [which German-speaking countries love to do]). Just in case it might help (for the links), Pablo ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror) archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [NTG-context] Re: XRechnung 2023-11-10 17:07 ` Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context @ 2023-11-10 17:47 ` Henning Hraban Ramm 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Henning Hraban Ramm @ 2023-11-10 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ntg-context Am 10.11.23 um 18:07 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context: > On 11/10/23 11:29, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: >> Am 10.11.23 um 09:37 schrieb juh+ntg-context--- via ntg-context: >>> Hi, >>> >>> does anyone produce the XML-based invoice called XRechnung with ConTeXt? >>> I don't know if XRechnung is the european name or only used in Germany? >> >> In German it’s ZUGFeRD, the international name is Factur-X: >> https://www.pdf-tools.com/pdf-knowledge/zugferd-standard-electronic-invoices/ > > According to https://www.ferd-net.de/standards/zugferd/, they may even > be two different things (but I haven’t checked it). Yes, sorry, XRechnung is the German federal version of EN-16931 for invoicing public contractees, while Factur-X (F) = ZUGFeRD (D) apparently is a different implementation of the same standard, stemming more from industry standards, that _can_ include XRechnung. Yet another mishmash of norms and standards where probably every implementor only supports a part (just an experienced guess). >> I always wanted to implement it, but never actually tried. >> It’s based on PDF/A, and I’m not sure about the proper workflow to get that. > > Someone told some time ago that https://github.com/speedata/publisher > implements ZugFeRD. Again, no idea how or to which extent. I remember talking to someone at a DANTE meeting about an implementation for LaTeX, but I can’t find it on CTAN. > https://zugferd.github.io/ provides more info. Version 2 of ZUGFeRD > seems to be Factur-X (according to them). > > If you allow me the pun (as a foreigner and non-native speaker), the > name seems to be too near to something like »Zug-Pferd« (I know it is > nonsense in German, but ZUGFeRD seems the name for an act or a > regulation [which German-speaking countries love to do]). The acronym is not accidental for sure. Somone probably neighed for joy. (Zugpferd = cart horse, draft horse, fig. also top seller) Hraban ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror) archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-11-10 17:51 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2023-11-10 8:37 [NTG-context] XRechnung juh+ntg-context--- via ntg-context 2023-11-10 10:29 ` [NTG-context] XRechnung Henning Hraban Ramm 2023-11-10 17:07 ` Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context 2023-11-10 17:47 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).