From: Peter Rolf <indiego@gmx.net>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: PDF/A generation
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:10:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e92720f2-54e6-fb68-bf24-55b4c088d1c4@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG5iGsDNe9unZJYVimRiLOX4D3nrTZaBWmQ6FJavkB2=EFxQZg@mail.gmail.com>
Am 14.10.2016 um 14:16 schrieb luigi scarso:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Peter Rolf <indiego@gmx.net> wrote:
>> Sigh.. I had high hopes on this one. Would be nice to have a free and
>> working (in this combination) validator. I'll make some tests over the
>> weekend and contact the author(s). No bug report, no fix.
>
> I have not said that it's wrong, only that it fails to validate the
> pdf..the validator could be ok infact.
True, that conclusion comes from my side. I'm pretty sure that all
needed XMP entries are properly set, so chances are high, that the error
is on their side. But we will (hopefully) see.
Also: If Acrobat isn't right, what tools are left for validation?
> Btw, as I can see from
> http://www.pdfa.org/2016/08/slide-decks-and-video-recordings-of-the-pdf-days-europe-2016/
> it seems that there is a bit of depression in validating pdf/a files ....
>
Interesting, but better don't dig too deep... :D
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-14 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-13 13:03 Henri Menke
2016-10-13 13:13 ` luigi scarso
2016-10-13 13:40 ` Henri Menke
2016-10-13 14:23 ` luigi scarso
2016-10-13 14:58 ` Peter Rolf
2016-10-14 9:22 ` luigi scarso
2016-10-14 12:04 ` Peter Rolf
2016-10-14 12:16 ` luigi scarso
2016-10-14 15:10 ` Peter Rolf [this message]
2016-10-18 12:54 ` Peter Rolf
2016-10-18 13:44 ` Henri Menke
2016-10-18 14:24 ` Peter Rolf
2016-10-19 14:23 ` Alan Braslau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e92720f2-54e6-fb68-bf24-55b4c088d1c4@gmx.net \
--to=indiego@gmx.net \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).