Re: mark ii/iv

[Jano Kula <jano.kula@tiscali.cz>]

>> After reading the document I still miss the good term for this level of 
>> versioning ("kind of version tag") to distiguish it from "usual" ConTeXt 
>> versioning.
>>
>> Hans H., how do you want these versioning systems to be called?
>>
>> ? [date version] = ConTeXt  ver: 2006.10.27 15:16
>> ? [mark version] = MK II
>>   
> the mk versioning is only relevant for engines, i.e. mkiv will provide lua based implementations as well as in the future more functionality. 
> 
> pdftex / xetex : mkii
> luatex         : mkiv 
> 
> in some sense, mkiv is a next generation context but downward compatible 

thanks, made it clearer: not level of versioning, but axis of versioning.

but still, how do we call it? mk version? and how we call the "usual" 
version then? i want to avoid confusion when speaking about version. 
guess which one ;)

there is already a command \markversion, but it doesn't seem to have 
something in common with this versioning.

jano