From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/55462 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vladimir Lomov Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 21:56:40 +0800 Message-ID: References: <3b4b12311001041436x3983c71bpc1ddee3e0d5d8ede@mail.gmail.com> <3b4b12311001050522v392e8a8fw556efd7529d8a5e9@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262699854 16710 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2010 13:57:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 13:57:34 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Jan 05 14:57:27 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NS9uG-00062U-NP for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:57:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90583C9BFB; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:57:08 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id EnGJaq69zb0d; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:57:08 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA39AC9C91; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:57:05 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2C7C9C91 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:57:04 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Fb0MQGqezMw7 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:57:02 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com (ey-out-1920.google.com [74.125.78.150]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58610C9BFB for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:57:02 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 3so4762027eyh.6 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 05:57:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=Qp8oc9uR3tlGJB9N1ylSkQpKybLL6rdzNw/A907bb6s=; b=UVte6gMosxOMasgopzOzc3IL+t5x9XylwrYy+yvvsbjS9QMdD1QLJxsJLcM7qB08SV Rjhz5lE+WoE0Z2BU0tw1WilsnZ3BcXqU2QyA9x1hE+v5qdAua85vf7B9bT5D6HVRA2N8 c1JL5sFQEmHg0ytcd9kZoEKRgIzTA/CeV09uI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=Ztmq3xhVc9SJHGsUGQaM5JpcswNN//uAdGzgMtdkYk1KBvfWacuY32pdzn0ataLFOB Riqe6qytuHSCI2tUUnVm4ROaz3VDIrmK0sXaYgTS821GgA+OrwiWP9SmB+qIBaT2g2Ll kIGRtfSDy0IZ4G9vRlkLXA8VREgHBKXI8FVDk= Original-Received: by 10.216.89.130 with SMTP id c2mr2414326wef.44.1262699821843; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 05:57:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3b4b12311001050522v392e8a8fw556efd7529d8a5e9@mail.gmail.com> X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:55462 Archived-At: Hello. 2010/1/5 Curiouslearn : > Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it > work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only > recently. Sorry, I didn't try to check texexec (MKII) also I just checked context (MKIV). > > Can someone please throw light on this? Is the disapperance of the > numbers, as Vladimir suggests, expected behavior of the minimal > example in MKIV. I also notice the difference between resulted pdf files produced by MKII and MKIV: MKIV gives labels _below_ line respect to item entry but MKII gives labels on the same line as item entry (also MKIV moves labels much more to left edge). This is what I figured out, sorry I too novice with ConTeXt and can't give more information on topic. 2010/1/5 Wolfgang Schuster : > > Am 05.01.2010 um 14:22 schrieb Curiouslearn: > >> Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it >> work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only >> recently. > > Add 'headalign=flushright'. > Hm, this gives more unpleasant result for MKIV format but reveals the problem of "disappearing" :) --- WBR, Vladimir Lomov ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________