* defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII
@ 2010-01-04 22:36 Curiouslearn
2010-01-04 22:50 ` \setupenumeration(s) was: defineenumeration does not work with MKIV Wolfgang Schuster
2010-01-05 4:03 ` defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII Vladimir Lomov
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Curiouslearn @ 2010-01-04 22:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Minimal example
\setuppapersize[letter][letter]
\starttext
\defineenumeration[problem][text= ,location=inleft]
\setupenumerations[problem][stopper=)]
\problem
problem 1
\problem
problem 2
\stoptext
In MKIV there are numbers do not appear.
Thanks.
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* \setupenumeration(s) was: defineenumeration does not work with MKIV
2010-01-04 22:36 defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII Curiouslearn
@ 2010-01-04 22:50 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2010-01-05 4:08 ` Vladimir Lomov
2010-01-05 4:03 ` defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII Vladimir Lomov
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Schuster @ 2010-01-04 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Sorry to hijack your post and since we're already there, why are \setupenumerations
and \setupdescriptions written in the plural form.
> \setupenumerations[problem][stopper=)]
When I would follow the system from other setup commands in context
i expect as correct names \setupenumeration and \setupdescription.
Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII
2010-01-04 22:36 defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII Curiouslearn
2010-01-04 22:50 ` \setupenumeration(s) was: defineenumeration does not work with MKIV Wolfgang Schuster
@ 2010-01-05 4:03 ` Vladimir Lomov
2010-01-05 13:22 ` Curiouslearn
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Lomov @ 2010-01-05 4:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Hi.
I'm newbie with ConTeXt but have experience with LaTeX.
2010/1/5 Curiouslearn <curiouslearn@gmail.com>:
> Minimal example
>
> \setuppapersize[letter][letter]
>
> \starttext
> \defineenumeration[problem][text= ,location=inleft]
> \setupenumerations[problem][stopper=)]
>
> \problem
> problem 1
>
>
> \problem
> problem 2
>
> \stoptext
>
> In MKIV there are numbers do not appear.
>
> Thanks.
This is because of your settings. Try change location. In order to
understand what's wrong with your settings see output for this example
(I tried with context minimals):
\setuppapersize[A5][A4]
\setuplayout[location=middle]
\starttext
\defineenumeration[problem][text= ,location=inleft]
\setupenumerations[problem][stopper=)]
\problem
problem 1
\problem
problem 2
\stoptext
In okular (or Adobe Reader) you see that enumeration numbers are out
of page and you don't see them.
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: \setupenumeration(s) was: defineenumeration does not work with MKIV
2010-01-04 22:50 ` \setupenumeration(s) was: defineenumeration does not work with MKIV Wolfgang Schuster
@ 2010-01-05 4:08 ` Vladimir Lomov
2010-01-05 8:27 ` Wolfgang Schuster
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Lomov @ 2010-01-05 4:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Hi.
2010/1/5 Wolfgang Schuster <schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com>:
> Sorry to hijack your post and since we're already there, why are \setupenumerations
> and \setupdescriptions written in the plural form.
>
>> \setupenumerations[problem][stopper=)]
>
> When I would follow the system from other setup commands in context
> i expect as correct names \setupenumeration and \setupdescription.
>
If I understand context manual correctly (I not checked this)
(cont-enp.pdf, pp. 181,183) I could use more than one name in
\setupenumerations (\setupdescriptions), e.g.
\setupenumerations[problem,remark][stopper=)]
so name of commands are correct (in some sense one is a limit of several :).
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: \setupenumeration(s) was: defineenumeration does not work with MKIV
2010-01-05 4:08 ` Vladimir Lomov
@ 2010-01-05 8:27 ` Wolfgang Schuster
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Schuster @ 2010-01-05 8:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Am 05.01.2010 um 05:08 schrieb Vladimir Lomov:
> 2010/1/5 Wolfgang Schuster <schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com>:
>> Sorry to hijack your post and since we're already there, why are \setupenumerations
>> and \setupdescriptions written in the plural form.
>>
>>> \setupenumerations[problem][stopper=)]
>>
>> When I would follow the system from other setup commands in context
>> i expect as correct names \setupenumeration and \setupdescription.
>>
> If I understand context manual correctly (I not checked this)
> (cont-enp.pdf, pp. 181,183) I could use more than one name in
> \setupenumerations (\setupdescriptions), e.g.
> \setupenumerations[problem,remark][stopper=)]
> so name of commands are correct (in some sense one is a limit of several :).
You could also use more names in \setuphead, \setupblock etc. but these
command names are singular. Changing \setupenumerations/descriptions is
no option but one can do this:
\let\setupdescription\setupdescriptions
\let\setupenumeration\setupenumerations
Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII
2010-01-05 4:03 ` defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII Vladimir Lomov
@ 2010-01-05 13:22 ` Curiouslearn
2010-01-05 13:52 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2010-01-05 13:56 ` Vladimir Lomov
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Curiouslearn @ 2010-01-05 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it
work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only
recently.
Can someone please throw light on this? Is the disapperance of the
numbers, as Vladimir suggests, expected behavior of the minimal
example in MKIV.
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Vladimir Lomov <lomov.vl@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm newbie with ConTeXt but have experience with LaTeX.
>
> 2010/1/5 Curiouslearn <curiouslearn@gmail.com>:
>> Minimal example
>>
>> \setuppapersize[letter][letter]
>>
>> \starttext
>> \defineenumeration[problem][text= ,location=inleft]
>> \setupenumerations[problem][stopper=)]
>>
>> \problem
>> problem 1
>>
>>
>> \problem
>> problem 2
>>
>> \stoptext
>>
>> In MKIV there are numbers do not appear.
>>
>> Thanks.
> This is because of your settings. Try change location. In order to
> understand what's wrong with your settings see output for this example
> (I tried with context minimals):
>
> \setuppapersize[A5][A4]
>
> \setuplayout[location=middle]
> \starttext
> \defineenumeration[problem][text= ,location=inleft]
> \setupenumerations[problem][stopper=)]
>
> \problem
> problem 1
>
>
> \problem
> problem 2
>
> \stoptext
>
> In okular (or Adobe Reader) you see that enumeration numbers are out
> of page and you don't see them.
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
>
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII
2010-01-05 13:22 ` Curiouslearn
@ 2010-01-05 13:52 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2010-01-05 13:56 ` Curiouslearn
2010-01-05 13:56 ` Vladimir Lomov
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Schuster @ 2010-01-05 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Am 05.01.2010 um 14:22 schrieb Curiouslearn:
> Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it
> work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only
> recently.
Add 'headalign=flushright'.
Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII
2010-01-05 13:52 ` Wolfgang Schuster
@ 2010-01-05 13:56 ` Curiouslearn
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Curiouslearn @ 2010-01-05 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Thanks! That worked great.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Wolfgang Schuster
<schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Am 05.01.2010 um 14:22 schrieb Curiouslearn:
>
>> Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it
>> work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only
>> recently.
>
> Add 'headalign=flushright'.
>
> Wolfgang
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
>
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII
2010-01-05 13:22 ` Curiouslearn
2010-01-05 13:52 ` Wolfgang Schuster
@ 2010-01-05 13:56 ` Vladimir Lomov
2010-01-05 14:14 ` Wolfgang Schuster
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Lomov @ 2010-01-05 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Hello.
2010/1/5 Curiouslearn <curiouslearn@gmail.com>:
> Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it
> work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only
> recently.
Sorry, I didn't try to check texexec (MKII) also I just checked context (MKIV).
>
> Can someone please throw light on this? Is the disapperance of the
> numbers, as Vladimir suggests, expected behavior of the minimal
> example in MKIV.
I also notice the difference between resulted pdf files produced by
MKII and MKIV: MKIV gives labels _below_ line respect to item entry
but MKII gives labels on the same line as item entry (also MKIV moves
labels much more to left edge).
This is what I figured out, sorry I too novice with ConTeXt and can't
give more information on topic.
2010/1/5 Wolfgang Schuster <schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com>:
>
> Am 05.01.2010 um 14:22 schrieb Curiouslearn:
>
>> Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it
>> work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only
>> recently.
>
> Add 'headalign=flushright'.
>
Hm, this gives more unpleasant result for MKIV format but reveals the
problem of "disappearing" :)
---
WBR, Vladimir Lomov
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII
2010-01-05 13:56 ` Vladimir Lomov
@ 2010-01-05 14:14 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2010-01-05 14:22 ` Vladimir Lomov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Schuster @ 2010-01-05 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Am 05.01.2010 um 14:56 schrieb Vladimir Lomov:
>>> Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it
>>> work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only
>>> recently.
>>
>> Add 'headalign=flushright'.
>>
> Hm, this gives more unpleasant result for MKIV format but reveals the
> problem of "disappearing" :)
It's side effect of the new 'headalign' key, you can correct by setting
the correct width for the number box.
\defineenumeration
[problem]
[text=,
location=inleft,
headalign=flushright,
stopper=),
width=\leftmarginwidth]
Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII
2010-01-05 14:14 ` Wolfgang Schuster
@ 2010-01-05 14:22 ` Vladimir Lomov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Lomov @ 2010-01-05 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Hi.
2010/1/5 Wolfgang Schuster <schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com>:
>
> Am 05.01.2010 um 14:56 schrieb Vladimir Lomov:
>
>>>> Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it
>>>> work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only
>>>> recently.
>>>
>>> Add 'headalign=flushright'.
>>>
>> Hm, this gives more unpleasant result for MKIV format but reveals the
>> problem of "disappearing" :)
>
>
> It's side effect of the new 'headalign' key, you can correct by setting
> the correct width for the number box.
>
> \defineenumeration
> [problem]
> [text=,
> location=inleft,
> headalign=flushright,
> stopper=),
> width=\leftmarginwidth]
>
Yes, this works like a charm (checked in both TL2009 and
context-minimals for MKII and MKIV formats).
---
WBR, Vladimir Lomov
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-01-05 14:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-01-04 22:36 defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII Curiouslearn
2010-01-04 22:50 ` \setupenumeration(s) was: defineenumeration does not work with MKIV Wolfgang Schuster
2010-01-05 4:08 ` Vladimir Lomov
2010-01-05 8:27 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2010-01-05 4:03 ` defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII Vladimir Lomov
2010-01-05 13:22 ` Curiouslearn
2010-01-05 13:52 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2010-01-05 13:56 ` Curiouslearn
2010-01-05 13:56 ` Vladimir Lomov
2010-01-05 14:14 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2010-01-05 14:22 ` Vladimir Lomov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).