* [NTG-context] mixed profiles in validation
@ 2025-02-16 9:16 Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context
2025-02-17 13:42 ` [NTG-context] " Ulrike Fischer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context @ 2025-02-16 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ConTeXt users; +Cc: Pablo Rodriguez
Hi Hans (and Steffen),
I get mixed profiles with the following source:
\setupbackend[format=ua2]
\starttext
a
\stoptext
The latest version of VeraPDF (https://software.verapdf.org/) complains
of both PDF-2 UA-2 detected and PDF-1.7 A-3a.
In fact, only VeraPDF only validates PDF-1.7 (and results are a mess).
I must admit I don’t know what may be causing the inclusion of the A-3a
profile (marking).
Any ideas about what may be going wrong here?
Many thanks for your help,
Pablo
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror)
archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [NTG-context] Re: mixed profiles in validation
2025-02-16 9:16 [NTG-context] mixed profiles in validation Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context
@ 2025-02-17 13:42 ` Ulrike Fischer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ulrike Fischer @ 2025-02-17 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ntg-context
Am Sun, 16 Feb 2025 10:16:21 +0100 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez via
ntg-context:
> Hi Hans (and Steffen),
>
> I get mixed profiles with the following source:
>
> \setupbackend[format=ua2]
> \starttext
> a
> \stoptext
>
> The latest version of VeraPDF (https://software.verapdf.org/) complains
> of both PDF-2 UA-2 detected and PDF-1.7 A-3a.
>
> In fact, only VeraPDF only validates PDF-1.7 (and results are a mess).
You can choose which standard you want to validate, on the command
line with e.g.
verapdf -f ua2 test-utf8.pdf
(It won't validate as your document doesn't contain tagging).
>
> I must admit I don’t know what may be causing the inclusion of the A-3a
> profile (marking).
No idea either, that is a context question. But PDF/A-3 is wrong
together with PDF 2.0/UA-2 you need pdf/A-4.
--
Ulrike Fischer
http://www.troubleshooting-tex.de/
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror)
archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-02-17 13:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-02-16 9:16 [NTG-context] mixed profiles in validation Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context
2025-02-17 13:42 ` [NTG-context] " Ulrike Fischer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).