ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [NTG-context] mixed profiles in validation
@ 2025-02-16  9:16 Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context
  2025-02-17 13:42 ` [NTG-context] " Ulrike Fischer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context @ 2025-02-16  9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ConTeXt users; +Cc: Pablo Rodriguez

Hi Hans (and Steffen),

I get mixed profiles with the following source:

  \setupbackend[format=ua2]
  \starttext
  a
  \stoptext

The latest version of VeraPDF (https://software.verapdf.org/) complains
of both PDF-2 UA-2 detected and PDF-1.7 A-3a.

In fact, only VeraPDF only validates PDF-1.7 (and results are a mess).

I must admit I don’t know what may be causing the inclusion of the A-3a
profile (marking).

Any ideas about what may be going wrong here?

Many thanks for your help,

Pablo
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror)
archive  : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
wiki     : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [NTG-context] Re: mixed profiles in validation
  2025-02-16  9:16 [NTG-context] mixed profiles in validation Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context
@ 2025-02-17 13:42 ` Ulrike Fischer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ulrike Fischer @ 2025-02-17 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ntg-context

Am Sun, 16 Feb 2025 10:16:21 +0100 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez via
ntg-context:

> Hi Hans (and Steffen),
> 
> I get mixed profiles with the following source:
> 
>   \setupbackend[format=ua2]
>   \starttext
>   a
>   \stoptext
> 
> The latest version of VeraPDF (https://software.verapdf.org/) complains
> of both PDF-2 UA-2 detected and PDF-1.7 A-3a.
> 
> In fact, only VeraPDF only validates PDF-1.7 (and results are a mess).

You can choose which standard you want to validate, on the command
line with e.g.

verapdf -f ua2 test-utf8.pdf

(It won't validate as your document doesn't contain tagging).

> 
> I must admit I don’t know what may be causing the inclusion of the A-3a
> profile (marking).

No idea either, that is a context question. But PDF/A-3 is wrong
together with PDF 2.0/UA-2 you need pdf/A-4.


-- 
Ulrike Fischer 
http://www.troubleshooting-tex.de/

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror)
archive  : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
wiki     : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-02-17 13:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-02-16  9:16 [NTG-context] mixed profiles in validation Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context
2025-02-17 13:42 ` [NTG-context] " Ulrike Fischer

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).