ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* suggestion for LMTX
@ 2019-04-27 10:22 Pablo Rodriguez
  2019-04-27 11:15 ` Hans Hagen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Rodriguez @ 2019-04-27 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mailing list for ConTeXt users

Hi Hans,

compiling the following sample with LMTX

    \starttext
    \contextmark

    \contextbanner
    \stoptext

outputs MKIV.

Wouldn’t LMTX be a better option than LMTX?

Many thanks for your help,

Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: suggestion for LMTX
  2019-04-27 10:22 suggestion for LMTX Pablo Rodriguez
@ 2019-04-27 11:15 ` Hans Hagen
  2019-04-27 11:43   ` Pablo Rodriguez
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hans Hagen @ 2019-04-27 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mailing list for ConTeXt users

On 4/27/2019 12:22 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> Hi Hans,
> 
> compiling the following sample with LMTX
> 
>      \starttext
>      \contextmark
> 
>      \contextbanner
>      \stoptext
> 
> outputs MKIV.
> 
> Wouldn’t LMTX be a better option than LMTX?

Why? Although there are some fundamental differences deep down, the LMTX 
version has the MKIV functionality. There might be a point where we bind 
a frozen version of MKIV to LuaTeX, but only when the code base becomes 
too hybrid to my taste. Of course there will be functionality only 
available when you use LMTX, but that is something Wolfgang and I need 
to figure out wrr the interface specification. Also, Alan and I need to 
deal with in the MetaFun code and documentation. At some point Taco and 
Mojca might want granularity in the Wiki. We'll see. I have no clue when 
users will have switched to lmtx for production anyway, as it's not 
something we want to enforce. (fwfw: I run lmtx by default.)

Hans

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
        tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: suggestion for LMTX
  2019-04-27 11:15 ` Hans Hagen
@ 2019-04-27 11:43   ` Pablo Rodriguez
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Rodriguez @ 2019-04-27 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ntg-context

On 4/27/19 1:15 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 4/27/2019 12:22 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> compiling the following sample with LMTX
>> [...]
>>   \contextmark
>> [...]
>> outputs MKIV.
>>
>> Wouldn’t LMTX be a better option than LMTX?
>
> Why? Although there are some fundamental differences deep down, the LMTX
> version has the MKIV functionality. There might be a point where we bind
> a frozen version of MKIV to LuaTeX, but only when the code base becomes
> too hybrid to my taste. Of course there will be functionality only
> available when you use LMTX, but that is something Wolfgang and I need
> to figure out wrr the interface specification. Also, Alan and I need to
> deal with in the MetaFun code and documentation. At some point Taco and
> Mojca might want granularity in the Wiki. We'll see. I have no clue when
> users will have switched to lmtx for production anyway, as it's not
> something we want to enforce. (fwfw: I run lmtx by default.)

Well, it was only an idea... which seems to be wrong.

Many thanks for your help,

Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-04-27 11:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-04-27 10:22 suggestion for LMTX Pablo Rodriguez
2019-04-27 11:15 ` Hans Hagen
2019-04-27 11:43   ` Pablo Rodriguez

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).