On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 09:18:35AM -0400, Carlos wrote: > \showmakeup on \TeX\ shows a > > tSP:3.282 > THK:-1.721 > H__E > X > HK:-1.291 > SP:3.282 > > I assume that SP stands for space. Correct me if I'm wrong > > After reading some of the manuals that mention \showmakeup with and > without [spaces] and so forth, I couldn't find any more info related > to this. > > If anyone can provide me more information as to what does HK means there? > > Anyhow > > If I were to have, say, a control _word_ such as \TeX\, the sequence of > TeX kerning is thrown off. The only remedy would be to have a a \qquad > preceding the control sequence e.g., {\qquad > \TeX\ significantly} to sort of ameliorate this side-effect. But then > again. Spacing is off. e.g., > > The separation of any of these four components would have > hurt {\qquad\TeX\ significantly}. If I had not participated fully in > > But it's interesting that \showmakeup, kerning and spaces would > display what's to be expected. And yet, the aformentioned set of > > tSP:3.282 > THK:-1.721 > H__E > X > HK:-1.291 > SP:3.282 > > is accurate nevertheless. And a very nice implementation at that, > but one I fear can't be included on a final document either. > > With that being said, the introduction of a \qquad, in addition to > \showmakeup with, say, redundancy aside, whatever is preceding the \TeX\ > alongside the file would also introduce a space where no space was ever > there before. > > Because of all of this, and unfortunately, \showmakeup is not quite helpful > here either. Although it does so displays the amount of spaces and > so forth, any addition of a \qquad also adds a very subtle unwanted > space. > > And since we're looking here, I pressume, solely for accuracy and > perfection, we're left here with neither: zero, zip. It evaporates. > > > -- > Dear Emily: > I'm still confused as to what groups articles should be posted > to. How about an example? > -- Still Confused > > Dear Still: > Ok. Let's say you want to report that Gretzky has been traded from > the Oilers to the Kings. Now right away you might think rec.sport.hockey > would be enough. WRONG. Many more people might be interested. This is a > big trade! Since it's a NEWS article, it belongs in the news.* hierarchy > as well. If you are a news admin, or there is one on your machine, try > news.admin. If not, use news.misc. > The Oilers are probably interested in geology, so try sci.physics. > He is a big star, so post to sci.astro, and sci.space because they are also > interested in stars. Next, his name is Polish sounding. So post to > soc.culture.polish. But that group doesn't exist, so cross-post to > news.groups suggesting it should be created. With this many groups of > interest, your article will be quite bizarre, so post to talk.bizarre as > well. (And post to comp.std.mumps, since they hardly get any articles > there, and a "comp" group will propagate your article further.) > You may also find it is more fun to post the article once in each > group. If you list all the newsgroups in the same article, some newsreaders > will only show the article to the reader once! Don't tolerate this. > -- Emily Postnews Answers Your Questions on Netiquette > > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net > archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ > wiki : https://contextgarden.net > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > -- As of next Tuesday, C will be flushed in favor of COBOL. Please update your programs.