From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/28196 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "luigi scarso" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: [OT] Is Indesign CS 2 better than ConTeXt ? Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 13:52:25 +0200 Message-ID: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1148558069 5572 80.91.229.2 (25 May 2006 11:54:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 11:54:29 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Thu May 25 13:54:25 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FjEQ4-0003R1-9T for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 May 2006 13:54:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F7A127D7; Thu, 25 May 2006 13:54:24 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22061-03; Thu, 25 May 2006 13:54:23 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC48127D4; Thu, 25 May 2006 13:52:29 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289D2127D4 for ; Thu, 25 May 2006 13:52:28 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22061-02 for ; Thu, 25 May 2006 13:52:27 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id E1858127B6 for ; Thu, 25 May 2006 13:52:26 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id t32so574346pyc for ; Thu, 25 May 2006 04:52:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.35.97.17 with SMTP id z17mr1520556pyl; Thu, 25 May 2006 04:52:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.35.132.18 with HTTP; Thu, 25 May 2006 04:52:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: "mailing list for ConTeXt users" Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:28196 Archived-At: OK, it is a big OFF TOPIC. Some notes * the Elements of Typographic Style was made with Indesign (true or false?) and the only words about TeX is an url (true or false ?) * indesign eat xml * there is an indesign server; maybe actually too much complex, but in the future? * I don't know if IDCS2 has some programming capabilities like ConTeXt Ofcourse : *IDCS2 come from Adobe, so it has the feature of latest pdf spec.; *IDCS2 is WYSIWYG * (...possibly many others...) But there is one important point: Can IDCS2 be view as candidate for automatic typesetting (xml->IDCS2->pdf) ? luigi