From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/29055 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "luigi scarso" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: [OT] Is Indesign CS 2 better than ConTeXt ? Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:21:05 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4476CFC2.2010901@wxs.nl> <4476E827.2010103@wxs.nl> <44A4DB5D.4090409@wxs.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1151659294 5598 80.91.229.2 (30 Jun 2006 09:21:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 09:21:34 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Jun 30 11:21:30 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FwFBj-0004sn-Tz for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:21:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A13127D4; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:21:23 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 11142-04; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:21:19 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B973127B9; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:21:16 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC47127B9 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:21:12 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 11198-02 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:21:08 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 6937A12791 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:21:06 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c31so203855nfb for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 02:21:06 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.78.140.17 with SMTP id n17mr96452hud; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 02:21:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.78.154.10 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 02:21:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: "mailing list for ConTeXt users" In-Reply-To: <44A4DB5D.4090409@wxs.nl> Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:29055 > i was refering to Rubinsteins digital typography, good, another book from your personal collection (how many others ?) >but Knuths book is > quite enjoyable too; my guess is that he did it in \TeX -) Yes , but not of-course. I think that Knuth can be the only one who can write about TeX and METAFONT \emphtf{without} use at all \TeX