On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:46 PM, R. Bastian wrote: > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:55:05 +0200 > luigi scarso scribit: > > > > > > > > > > May be that ConTeXt is not a 'context free language' ;-) > > > than it will be difficult to express something in a BNF grammar > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backus-Naur_form. > > > > > hmm. > > Context is a macro package in TeX language which is Turing Complete. > > > > > > > But if (ConTeXt == formal_language), it should be possible to > > > develop TEXT, NUMBER, DIMENSION, REFERENCE, etc > > > and also to add examples for "[optional user data]". > > > > > hmm > > I'm not sure that ConTeXt == TeX (but it seems YES) , > > I'm nor sure that TeX is a context free language too, > > in the sense that I never see a BNF grammar of TeX . > (chap.24-26 of the Texbook are embryos of a grammar, but they are not > usable > like the grammar of Pascal or Python) > > I suspect that TeX is not a cfl . > > > > Anyway, > > lpeg can make the thing easier > > > > -- > > luigi > > > I think that something user-friendly could be do in a cooperative wiki (in > the between, i found > http://texshow.contextgarden.net/) beginning with > > CONTEXT_SOURCE ::= PREAMBLE "\starttext" TEXT "\stoptext" | CONTEXT_SOURCE > TEXT ::= STARTSTOPS | SETUPS | DEFINES | OTHERS [ TEXT > > and so on. > Consider that one can always make some dirty tricks in PREAMBLE to render useless "\starttext" or "\stoptext" To be general, i think MY_CONTEXT_SOURCE ::= MACRO* END For example , let's try $>context test where test.tex ::="\end" or test.tex ::="FOO\end" Are there any errors ? No Is test.tex in {CONTEXT_SOURCE } ? No Is test.tex in {MY_CONTEXT_SOURCE} Yes so MY_CONTEXT_SOURCE includes CONTEXT_SOURCE (of course test.tex ::="\end""\starttext""\stoptext" is also in {CONTEXT_SOURCE } ) I think that a bnf or lpeg grammar is really useful for a sort of standard-ConTeXt or minimal-ConTeXt or light-ConTeXt ie a ConTeXt to use as "reference" but can be a bit hard to define -- luigi