On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Taco Hoekwater <taco@elvenkind.com> wrote:

>
>
> luigi scarso wrote:
> >
> > $>pdffonts felltype.pdf
> > name                                 type              emb sub uni object
> ID
> > ------------------------------------ ----------------- --- --- ---
> ---------
> > PDPWHW+LMRoman12-Regular             CID Type 0C       yes yes yes      4
>  0
> > DUTOMC+IM_FELL_Double_Pica_PRO_Roman CID Type 0C       yes yes yes      5
>  0
> >
> > $>pdffonts felltype_oo.pdf
> > name                                 type              emb sub uni object
> ID
> > ------------------------------------ ----------------- --- --- ---
> ---------
> > FTLUYL+IM_FELL_Double_Pica_PRO_Roman Type 1C           yes yes no       8
>  0
> > FTLUYL+IM_FELL_Double_Pica_PRO_Roman Type 1C
> >
> > So I don't understand how OO "transform" this opentype in a Type1 ,
>
> I guess that that is not hard when a document uses no more than 256
> glyphs from the font.


yes, a sort of creation of font encodings at fly for more than 256 glyphs --
but why ?
Also, does it fix em size, given that this appears to be the root of the
problem ?


> Can you experiment a bit and see what happens
> if you use more of them?
>
> yes ,if I have time this weekend -- volunteer welcome, of course.



-- 
luigi