Re: Suggestion

[luigi scarso <luigi.scarso@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1071 bytes --]

>
>
> Anyway, I highly respect the ConTeXt and LuaTeX's work.
> But if Taco and Hans can :
>
> - use a proper regexp library (like lrexlib?), not the silly lpeg

PEG are not silly at all. PEG *include* regex, but not viceversa,
and it seems to have the same power of  CFG, so you can build a parser for
pratically anything
(and you can not do this with regex) .
Perhaps the reverse sentence has more sense: drop the "silly" (?) regex, use
the new peg.
For what I know the reverse side of lpeg is that a file must be loaded in
memory completly.

- more powerful multi columns (maybe not through gird typesetting?)
>
Maybe columnset can do  more, or we need more examples from hans .


- full support of xslt:)
>
why not xquery too? Are mkiv  supposed to be a full  xml processor ?
A bit of xslt can be done with lpeg (and not regex),
but usually  it's better to prepare a xml to typeset before processing with
mkiv
("use the right tool for the right task").


> Things might be a lot better...
>
and worse too .
Things are now a lot better than before ,IMMO .


-- 
luigi

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1887 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 487 bytes --]

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________