On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl> wrote:
Xan wrote:

Really, I did not know that. It's a messy thing that we could not define what we like ;-)

it's the nature of a tex macro package; ok, i can add some strict testing for in in mkiv but even then it might just be that someone who knows th einternals (like wolfgang or wolfgang or wolfgang) wants to overload something built in by something better
why not discipline ?

I mean something like
0) context macro are ok
1) \usemodule[foo] are ok (no collision with macros in 0)
2) define your macros inside
\startPrivate[namespace]
...
\stopPrivate
3) explicit  redefinition of macros in 0,1

by 3) should be no collision between 0,1,2


--
luigi