From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/52394 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: luigi scarso Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Error in last current Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:45:47 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4A8A61A0.5070504@wxs.nl> <4A8A64C2.2050609@wxs.nl> <4A8A6724.1010304@wxs.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1250585169 30386 80.91.229.12 (18 Aug 2009 08:46:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:46:09 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Aug 18 10:46:02 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MdKKQ-0003gp-2L for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:46:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C8BC9A97; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:45:59 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id H6baPc1SliEM; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:45:53 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC315C9A77; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:45:53 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC10EC9A77 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:45:52 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id XfUdP6oQ-pDq for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:45:47 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f220.google.com (mail-bw0-f220.google.com [209.85.218.220]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55981C9A47 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:45:47 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by bwz20 with SMTP id 20so4284672bwz.9 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:45:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LyrK83yCMEIXcYkn0XOrVRpd4AI1+X2Nvzti9A2evJA=; b=OQEQ1xHajfhlvlSiJv4CYz7NMAaMJIyUCMSG1a6I8NjP1KYIjE79+/B+8h/GrJnNrH zPiKp6WwZBUc6WEd7KDeXhJhVhhzbjmONI+s0c4seXkyNJP7GaikE5TWksa1+2Uq7aGP 0nvaaTirFUOC1VuajJQ7WG+BaCHFJIzD+PcxI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Pou4Pcr4IVLRn5u4PPKeJOccFI6cTaR7HgDUrY9psYq8flK3w5NLBly5MVA5Rtun4b evRAaZlNIYGKfw4IgVYeq+r6QskgpRKghpNq96E7VNBe27zszxJrGeTs/qj13fmGe6SF eksJoXi8XYjxZYzjHLT3jCvuwLV1bs0wxT3dw= Original-Received: by 10.204.154.83 with SMTP id n19mr3565592bkw.121.1250585147077; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:45:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A8A6724.1010304@wxs.nl> X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:52394 Archived-At: On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: > luigi scarso wrote: >>> >>> the node.dimensions function was added recently so it seems that you're >>> missing it >> >> Probably, I miss something sometime... >> Ok , I will check it with last luatex rev. >> (imho, I think that a current should be work with last luatex form >> supelec, not from svn) > > currently you need the latest No, if as "latest" you mean luatex-snapshot-0.42.0.tar.bz2 from supelec Yes, if as "latest" you mean luatex from svn > > i could built in fallbacks but it messes up the code so that will not happen > before we reach a more stable state that's ok for me but then you should say "this current works with this luatex from supelec or this lutex revision" If no, it's a useless current. -- luigi ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________