From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/54745 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: luigi scarso Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: font-syn.lua error Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:54:36 +0100 Message-ID: References: <6EB9F6E0-988D-4284-99CF-FBCDF92A5446@uni-koblenz.de> <4B092B91.8040003@wxs.nl> <4B09391D.9090801@wxs.nl> <20091122140040.GB11240@khaled-laptop> <4B09AAE0.90504@wxs.nl> <0A1A466E-ADDA-4AE1-804D-198EB194BA4D@uni-bonn.de> <9417CE52-28B8-4160-9471-FCFF8D5612E7@uni-bonn.de> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1259139302 9951 80.91.229.12 (25 Nov 2009 08:55:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:55:02 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Nov 25 09:54:56 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NDDeJ-0001mb-LS for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:54:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 563F1C9BF1; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:52:07 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id jl70QS46WhkF; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:52:06 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D4CC9C15; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:52:03 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B5F5C9C15 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:52:01 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id eeiVHlKa5OsM for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:51:49 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f220.google.com (mail-bw0-f220.google.com [209.85.218.220]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A480C9BF1 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:51:49 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by bwz20 with SMTP id 20so5610624bwz.34 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:54:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dlkNu6WzkpI3uHICnQi2zfXAhLIoi6WLRpqlHTPUWYw=; b=lGZssLteNyB+A00hkk6Tv1ex79Fyaz7IZNtp9Lu8msG/kjaeZgz/wVvEo1gCOKON59 ik9U2TaxZ2lxwzEzlZQNVkZw1THFay8lc1T9Ne3iYl2i9k43zxG6qTgaZzDDP+JIAK6n aV+68tCIDurgcBRndcLNQaWMicCMGzbTxh/xE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=r+DACvf+MZMgVWBSOYldf1QNB7GtFibNw7wooDnF5gtL+umoeeBE7sBuYn29+0tGQr BKbQ6e84oNx4wI32fuK3JRGiQR7QxOh7ZHMXJKPXzyUwq9oZJVyaw0NnlgfGfy/KZr8i WBIvrj+yV5q+ftG2E+JOGKOXfFXWAmAmQ8O1E= Original-Received: by 10.204.34.20 with SMTP id j20mr3887240bkd.57.1259139276075; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:54:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <9417CE52-28B8-4160-9471-FCFF8D5612E7@uni-bonn.de> X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:54745 Archived-At: On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: > > On Nov 25, 2009, at 8:15 AM, luigi scarso wrote: > >>> 1. In evince under linux, the file looked fine, no problems were apparent. >> what about xpdf and ghostscript? >> Can you also try with mupdf ? > > That wasn't the point, I was not trying to give a comparative table of pdf-viewers. luatex was buggy, but some viewers displayed the pdf nonetheless. Doesn't make sense to test a dozen viewers because next time around, the subset which does or does not work may be totally different. Not dozen, only 2~3 but code independent .My choices are 1) xpdf (same codebase of luatex) 2)acroread (the most important viewer for pdf ) 3) ghostscript (also used by context ) They are all used / important for TeX community and printing house. mupdf comes from ghostscript team , it's quick but young, it comes with some interesting cmdline tools . Until now I was not able to use it as viewer in everyday use, so I don't know if it's good or not for checking pdf made by luatex I believe that Taco knows mupdf better than me. -- luigi ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________