From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/59369 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Yury G. Kudryashov" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: ConTeXt unit testing Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 15:12:09 +0400 Message-ID: References: <4C0B64D9.8090403@elvenkind.com> <4C0B7A6E.1030801@elvenkind.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1275822752 9986 80.91.229.12 (6 Jun 2010 11:12:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 11:12:32 +0000 (UTC) To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sun Jun 06 13:12:31 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OLDmH-0007Hr-8L for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 13:12:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C087CC9C9A; Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:12:28 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id PoBCDIhxG0WL; Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:12:26 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5B3C9C01; Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:12:26 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53FA0C9BAE for ; Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:12:25 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id kTMmFysUQpl2 for ; Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:12:23 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C73FC9C01 for ; Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:12:22 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OLDmA-0007Co-82 for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 13:12:22 +0200 Original-Received: from 212.192.251.49 ([212.192.251.49]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 13:12:22 +0200 Original-Received: from urkud by 212.192.251.49 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 13:12:22 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ connect(): No such file or directory Original-Followup-To: gmane.comp.tex.context Original-Lines: 30 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.192.251.49 User-Agent: KNode/4.4.3 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:59369 Archived-At: Taco Hoekwater wrote: > Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 11:05, Taco Hoekwater wrote wrote: >>> Mojca Miklavec wrote: >>>> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 17:13, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: >>>>> Are there any automatic unit test for ConTeXt distribution? >>>> I'm thinking that we might want to set up one on a server. >>> We already have a server for tests: >>> >>> http://foundry.supelec.fr/gf/project/contexttest/ >> >> Yes, but some metadata is missing and some architecture to actually >> run those tests (some tests only make sense in MKII and some only in >> MKIV etc.). >> >> I would definitely prefer if some function "run_the_unit_tests" >> existed, but we probably need to write one first. > > Just saying there is no need for yet another server (you cannot > run tests server-side anyway). Why? I was talking about fully automatic tests, not tests like "compile and open result in the viewer". I understand that there is not too much functionality that can be tested automatically (hence, server-side), but at least some basic things can be tested. Probably, more features can be tested server-side analyzing the result pdf file using some library (though I don't know the pdf-parsing libraries sufficiently good to implement it). ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________