* Re: Re: cygwin/tetex or miktex?
@ 2004-10-11 4:34 rb
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: rb @ 2004-10-11 4:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
"Patrick Gundlach" <patrick@gundla.ch> writes:
> Hello rb,
>
>> Is one of these two preferable when running ConTeXt on windows?
>
> please don't use the subject alone, it is confusing.
Hello Patrick,
Good point, thanks for the reminder and thanks for the suggestions.
> You can also use fptex (or texlive). I'd prefer fptex over miktex over
> tetex/cygwin. But I am not the person to ask, since I haven't seen a
> windows system in a while. Just my impression from reading some
> mailing lists and news groups. You might think of posting your
> experience to this list.
If I have any experiences worth sharing, I shall certainly do so.
Thank-you
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: cygwin/tetex or miktex?
2004-10-10 20:57 ` Patrick Gundlach
@ 2004-10-10 21:07 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Henning Hraban Ramm @ 2004-10-10 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
> You can also use fptex (or texlive). I'd prefer fptex over miktex over
> tetex/cygwin. But I am not the person to ask, since I haven't seen a
> windows system in a while.
But you're right. I use TeXlive with ConTeXt on WinXP at work (and on
MacOS X at home).
Grüßlis vom Hraban!
---
http://www.fiee.net/texnique/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-10-11 4:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-10-11 4:34 Re: cygwin/tetex or miktex? rb
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-08 23:17 rb
2004-10-10 20:57 ` Patrick Gundlach
2004-10-10 21:07 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).